BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

118 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Reassessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,424Delhi4,031Chennai1,069Kolkata998Bangalore953Ahmedabad952Jaipur861Pune694Hyderabad597Chandigarh373Surat341Indore306Raipur291Visakhapatnam257Rajkot246Amritsar241Cochin166Agra136Patna123Guwahati118Cuttack111Lucknow110Nagpur104Dehradun73Jodhpur58Allahabad53Karnataka44Telangana43Jabalpur29Ranchi26Panaji24Calcutta19Varanasi9Kerala7Orissa7SC6Gauhati3Rajasthan2Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 148120Section 14781Section 153A74Section 143(3)70Section 6870Addition to Income69Section 153C50Section 25037Section 143(2)

AMOLAKSHAYA TRADE AND CREDIT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 4/GTY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)(a)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act on 24.03.2016 (paper book page1) and thereafter issued notice u/s. 148 of the Act on 29.03.2016 (paper book page 2). Thereafter, on 01.06.2016 he transferred the reassessment

AMOLAKSHAYA TRADE AND CREDIT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 118 · Page 1 of 6

33
Reassessment25
Reopening of Assessment24
Penalty13
ITA 5/GTY/2019[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Guwahati
12 Jun 2020
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)(a)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act on 24.03.2016 (paper book page1) and thereafter issued notice u/s. 148 of the Act on 29.03.2016 (paper book page 2). Thereafter, on 01.06.2016 he transferred the reassessment

SHREE PRAKSH SINGH,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIGBOI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 14/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.14/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri S. P. Bhati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Sen, JCIT, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 50C(1)

reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 147/ 148 was bad in law. 4. Brief facts qua the issue

KAUSHIK INDUSTRIES (P) LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TINSUKIA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 11/GTY/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147(1)Section 148Section 263

147 clearly expunges that if notice for reopening of assessment was issued on one aspect and in course of reassessment proceedings another aspect was discovered, reassessment order would be valid, only if, aspect which led to reopening of assessment continues to form part of the reassessed income. If after issuing a notice u/s

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

reassessment proceeding u/s. 147 by issue of a notice u/s. 148, in spite of the fact that none of conditions

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

reassessment proceeding u/s. 147 by issue of a notice u/s. 148, in spite of the fact that none of conditions

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. ARIHANT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED , GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 275/GTY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 43(5)Section 73

reassessment holding that the Revenue was unable to satisfy the conditions precedent in first proviso to Section 147 of the Act. 9.6. Further, in the case of Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd Vs. CIT (291 ITR 500) Hon’ble Supreme Court held that an assessment originally completed u/s

NAMITA MALLA SARKAR,AGARTALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-UDAIPUR, AGARTALA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 426/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.426/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2016-17)

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Jayanta Mridha, JCIT, Sr. D.R
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 147/ 148 was bad in law.At the outset the ld. Counsel

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI vs. BMG INFORMATICS PVT. LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, both, the appeal of the revenue as well as cross objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 61/GTY/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati07 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17

For Respondent: Shri Amit Kumar Pandey, JCIT
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

reassessment u/s. 147 of the Act. 2.3. Ld. AO has implicated the assessee for unaccounted cash transactions with DSSPL

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH vs. T & T PROJECTS LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result and for the reasons discussed above, we find no merit in this appeal

ITA 208/GTY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.208/Gau/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2010-11)

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Bhardwaj, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Ramesh Goenka, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment proceeding u/s 147 was resorted to. The scheme of section 147 in so far as it is applicable

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 67/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

u/s 147 of the Act after a period of 4 years has been quashed. Similarly in the case of CIT vs Multiplex Trading & Industrial ((63 taxmann.com 170) (Delhi HC), the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that since the assessee has disclosed all the material facts at the time of making assessment, initiation of reassessment

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 68/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

u/s 147 of the Act after a period of 4 years has been quashed. Similarly in the case of CIT vs Multiplex Trading & Industrial ((63 taxmann.com 170) (Delhi HC), the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that since the assessee has disclosed all the material facts at the time of making assessment, initiation of reassessment

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 69/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

u/s 147 of the Act after a period of 4 years has been quashed. Similarly in the case of CIT vs Multiplex Trading & Industrial ((63 taxmann.com 170) (Delhi HC), the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that since the assessee has disclosed all the material facts at the time of making assessment, initiation of reassessment

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. DS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 284/GTY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati11 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: the Hon'ble

For Appellant: Sandeep Goel, Advocate
Section 133ASection 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 69C

reassessment u/s 147 of the Act. Accordingly, notice u/s 148 3 DS Systems Private Limited of the Act was issued

LAKSHMI NARAYAN COAL AND MINES LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 174/GTY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

reassessment of your return u/s 147. Statutory notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) are enclosed herewith. Yours faithfully

RI-BHOI ISPAT & ROLLING MILLS,BYRNIHAT vs. ITO, WARD- BYRNIHAT, BYRNIHAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 241/GTY/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Aug 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 133ASection 147Section 250Section 69C

reassessment proceedings, the ground 1 of the appellant that the order passed u/s 147 is bad in law is duly

ASSAM VALLEY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT PVT LTD,GUWAHATI vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE 1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 75/GTY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati18 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm Assam Valley Finance & Dcit, Circle 1 Investment Pvt. Ltd. Aayakar Bhawan, Christian Basti, House No.1, Niligiri Path, G.S Road, Guwahati-781005, Vs. Zoo Road, Guwahati-781024 Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabca6974B Assessee By : Shri Miraj D Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.12.2025 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 151ASection 68

147 r.w.s. 148 of the Act with great care and caution as by exercising the reassessment jurisdiction u/s. 147

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

ITA 72/GTY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250Section 68

reassessment is that there is no need to resort to Section 147 of the I. T. Act and to consider the disallowance in the assessment to be made under section 153 of the I.T. Act? 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in misinterpreting the CBDT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

ITA 73/GTY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250Section 68

reassessment is that there is no need to resort to Section 147 of the I. T. Act and to consider the disallowance in the assessment to be made under section 153 of the I.T. Act? 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in misinterpreting the CBDT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 21/GTY/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68

u/s 147 of the Act in relation to the same sale proceeds received in the bank account. And pursuant to the re-opening, in the reassessment