BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

25 results for “reassessment”+ Section 96clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,151Mumbai1,110Chennai376Bangalore327Jaipur203Kolkata196Ahmedabad174Hyderabad131Chandigarh128Raipur79Pune62Amritsar56Surat55Rajkot50Indore49Patna38Cochin36Telangana36Karnataka34Agra32Allahabad30Lucknow27Guwahati25Nagpur23Jodhpur18Visakhapatnam16Dehradun13Cuttack13SC8Orissa5Calcutta5Rajasthan2Panaji1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 6847Section 14846Section 25027Addition to Income24Section 143(3)22Section 14716Section 26313Reassessment11Section 270A7Section 271A

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

section 147 required to be reopened again. The perusal of the reasons extracted supra would reveal that the allegation of the ld. Assessing Officer is that during the course of search, a document was found inventorized as SD ABCI 03 page 53. Now this document cannot be an incriminating document because it is part of a ledger account

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

7
Penalty7
Depreciation5

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

section 147 required to be reopened again. The perusal of the reasons extracted supra would reveal that the allegation of the ld. Assessing Officer is that during the course of search, a document was found inventorized as SD ABCI 03 page 53. Now this document cannot be an incriminating document because it is part of a ledger account

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- JORHAT, JORHAT vs. M/S. TOOR FINANCE COMPANY LTD,, JORHAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 305/GTY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148

section 68 and Rs.26,83,650/- being commission paid by the assessee for arranging this bogus accommodation entry of unexplained credit amounting to Rs.8,94,55,000/-. He calculated the commission at the rate of 3% and in this way determined the taxable income of the assessee at Rs.9,21,96,300/-. 6. Before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority

SHRI PRABAL ROY CHOUDHURY,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250Section 263

96,150/-. 3. The ld. Commissioner took cognizance under section 263 of the Income Tax Act on the ground that assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly a notice under section 263 of the Income Tax Act was issued on 30th December, 2016. Ultimately ld. Commissioner has passed an order under section

INDER CHAND SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 49/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

reassessment proceeding was carried out. During the course of assessment proceedings, ld. Assessing Officer found that the assessee has shown exempt income under section 10(38) of the Act at Rs.2,26,85,516/- from sale of 1,87,500 equity shares of CCL International Limited. Ld. Assessing Officer observed that the said shares were purchased by the assessee

SAROJ DEVI SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOEM TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 51/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

reassessment proceeding was carried out. During the course of assessment proceedings, ld. Assessing Officer found that the assessee has shown exempt income under section 10(38) of the Act at Rs.2,26,85,516/- from sale of 1,87,500 equity shares of CCL International Limited. Ld. Assessing Officer observed that the said shares were purchased by the assessee

SUNITA CHOUDHURY,MAKUM ROAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 136/GTY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Largely On Account Of The Fact That Even At That Stage The Assessee Did Not Respond To The Notices Issued From His Office.

Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 148ASection 151Section 250Section 68

reassessment is liable to be cancelled. 6. For that the Id. CIT(A) ought to have hold that the notice under section 148 of the Act having been issued on a factually incorrect and erroneous premise, the same is bad in law and consequently, the order of re-assessment is unsustainable. 7. For that the Id. CIT(A) ought

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 222/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

96,131/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 219/GTY/2024: 1. For that the initiation of reassessment proceeding on 28-07-2022 by issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law and as such assessment

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 221/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

96,131/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 219/GTY/2024: 1. For that the initiation of reassessment proceeding on 28-07-2022 by issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law and as such assessment

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 220/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

96,131/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 219/GTY/2024: 1. For that the initiation of reassessment proceeding on 28-07-2022 by issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law and as such assessment

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 218/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

96,131/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 219/GTY/2024: 1. For that the initiation of reassessment proceeding on 28-07-2022 by issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law and as such assessment

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 223/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

96,131/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 219/GTY/2024: 1. For that the initiation of reassessment proceeding on 28-07-2022 by issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law and as such assessment

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 219/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

96,131/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 219/GTY/2024: 1. For that the initiation of reassessment proceeding on 28-07-2022 by issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law and as such assessment

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 217/GTY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

96,131/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 219/GTY/2024: 1. For that the initiation of reassessment proceeding on 28-07-2022 by issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law and as such assessment

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR vs. ROHIT KUMAR GULGULIA, SILCHAR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 182/GTY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Babu Lal Jain, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 68

section 68, since an amount appearing as opening balance is also a credit and the explanation offered by the assessee regarding the nature and source of which was not satisfactory in the opinion of the AO?” 3. From the perusal of above listed grounds, department is in appeal primarily on two issues, one relating to the jurisdictional and legal aspect

JUGAL CHANDRA SAIKIA,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 259/GTY/2018[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati27 Jan 2025AY 1993-94

Bench: Sri Manomohan Das & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143Section 250Section 254

reassessment order afresh in the light of findings of the Special Judge on the charge sheet filed against the appellant. (Tribunal's order at Page number 12 to 16 of the paper-book, at ANNEXURE-4) {emphasis supplied} 1.3 The learned AO has given effect to the Hon'ble Tribunal's order by the purported order u/s 254 (which should

JUGAL CHANDRA SAIKIA,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 258/GTY/2018[1992-93]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati27 Jan 2025AY 1992-93

Bench: Sri Manomohan Das & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143Section 250Section 254

reassessment order afresh in the light of findings of the Special Judge on the charge sheet filed against the appellant. (Tribunal's order at Page number 12 to 16 of the paper-book, at ANNEXURE-4) {emphasis supplied} 1.3 The learned AO has given effect to the Hon'ble Tribunal's order by the purported order u/s 254 (which should

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 69/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

96,800/- on account of non-genuine loss incurred by the assessee and Rs.2,85,296/- on account of payment of brokerage/commission incurred for non- genuine loss, totaling to Rs.1,09,82,096/-. 6. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. First Appellate Authority. The ld. CIT(A), dismissed the appeal of the assessee both

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 68/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

96,800/- on account of non-genuine loss incurred by the assessee and Rs.2,85,296/- on account of payment of brokerage/commission incurred for non- genuine loss, totaling to Rs.1,09,82,096/-. 6. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. First Appellate Authority. The ld. CIT(A), dismissed the appeal of the assessee both

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 67/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

96,800/- on account of non-genuine loss incurred by the assessee and Rs.2,85,296/- on account of payment of brokerage/commission incurred for non- genuine loss, totaling to Rs.1,09,82,096/-. 6. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. First Appellate Authority. The ld. CIT(A), dismissed the appeal of the assessee both