BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “reassessment”+ Section 90clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,446Mumbai1,379Chennai449Bangalore368Jaipur282Ahmedabad278Kolkata269Hyderabad256Chandigarh135Pune126Surat119Raipur99Indore96Amritsar80Cochin79Visakhapatnam70Rajkot56Nagpur56Cuttack44Lucknow36Telangana35Guwahati28Allahabad28Ranchi28Patna25Karnataka17Agra15Dehradun15Jodhpur12SC7Jabalpur6Calcutta4Orissa4Varanasi3Rajasthan2Gauhati1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 6855Section 14835Section 153C31Section 25026Addition to Income26Depreciation14Disallowance14Reassessment10Section 271A9Section 143(3)

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 110/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

9
Section 40A(3)9
Section 369

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 116/GTY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 112/GTY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 117/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 114/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 118/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

90,14,300/-. However, the assessee’s Ld. AR conveyed that no addition on account of the difference in the purchase price was made in any of the assessment years and the property was purchased in 2013 as per paper book pages 87 to 125 in which the transactions are dated 01.11.2013. It was also contended

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA , AGARTALA vs. SHRI SUBHAJIT PAUL, AGARTALA

In the result, cross-objection nos

ITA 116/GTY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati31 Jul 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.116/Gau/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Rockein Saikia, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Modi, FCA
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153D

section & served upon the assessee. 4. Sentence regarding approval u/s. 153D is to be mentioned in “note not for the assessee”. 5. Return income must be mentioned in the body of the order. -do- …do… 09- 21,48,280 …..do ….. 10 ….do... …do…. 10- 27,90

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 21/GTY/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. DS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 284/GTY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati11 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: the Hon'ble

For Appellant: Sandeep Goel, Advocate
Section 133ASection 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 69C

90,070/-. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act. During the year, assessee was engaged in supply/sale of items like computer laptops, UPS, Battery, power banks, laptop bags etc. After taking necessary approval from the competent authority u/s 151 of the Act, the case was selected for reassessment u/s 147 of the Act. Accordingly

INDER CHAND SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 49/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

reassessment proceeding was carried out. During the course of assessment proceedings, ld. Assessing Officer found that the assessee has shown exempt income under section 10(38) of the Act at Rs.2,26,85,516/- from sale of 1,87,500 equity shares of CCL International Limited. Ld. Assessing Officer observed that the said shares were purchased by the assessee

SAROJ DEVI SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOEM TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 51/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

reassessment proceeding was carried out. During the course of assessment proceedings, ld. Assessing Officer found that the assessee has shown exempt income under section 10(38) of the Act at Rs.2,26,85,516/- from sale of 1,87,500 equity shares of CCL International Limited. Ld. Assessing Officer observed that the said shares were purchased by the assessee

MITCHELL WANKHAR,SHILLONG vs. ITO W-2, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 274/GTY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati11 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10(26)Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 271ASection 4Section 44ASection 69A

reassessment proceedings initiated by the department were bad in law as no notice u/s.148A and subsequent order passed u/s148(d) were served on your appellant. Further, copies of satisfaction note and sanction from higher authority was also not provided to your appellant before issuing notice u/s. 148. The notice u/s. 148 was issued by JAO and not by NFAC

MITCHELL WANKHAR,SHILLONG vs. ITO W-2, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 275/GTY/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati11 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10(26)Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 271ASection 4Section 44ASection 69A

reassessment proceedings initiated by the department were bad in law as no notice u/s.148A and subsequent order passed u/s148(d) were served on your appellant. Further, copies of satisfaction note and sanction from higher authority was also not provided to your appellant before issuing notice u/s. 148. The notice u/s. 148 was issued by JAO and not by NFAC

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 218/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

90,16,960/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act after holding the same as not genuine expenditure. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 221/GTY/2024: 1. For that under the facts & circumstances of the case, learned A.O. is not justified in initiating

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 219/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

90,16,960/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act after holding the same as not genuine expenditure. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 221/GTY/2024: 1. For that under the facts & circumstances of the case, learned A.O. is not justified in initiating

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 222/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

90,16,960/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act after holding the same as not genuine expenditure. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 221/GTY/2024: 1. For that under the facts & circumstances of the case, learned A.O. is not justified in initiating

JAYANTA KHAUND,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 223/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 68

90,16,960/- u/s 68 of I.T. Act after holding the same as not genuine expenditure. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal. ITA No. 221/GTY/2024: 1. For that under the facts & circumstances of the case, learned A.O. is not justified in initiating