D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self: 4,76,16,069 Minor son Rahul: 4,76,21,211) 4 BACHH RAJ 2015-16 Jackson Investment 6,56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century

ASHA CHOUDHURY,IMPHAL vs. INCOME TAX WARD 1 IMPHAL, IMPHAL

Bench: the date of hearing.”

52) substituted the old regime for reassessment with a new regime. The first proviso to section 149 does not expressly

ASHA CHOUDHURY,IMPHAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 IMPHAL, IMPHAL

Bench: the date of hearing.”

52) substituted the old regime for reassessment with a new regime. The first proviso to section 149 does not expressly

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

reassessment was pending on the date of initiation of search under section 132 or making of requisition under section 132A, while computing the total income of the assessee under section 153A of the Act, additions or disallowances can be made only on the basis of the incriminating material found during the search or requisition. In the present case