BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “reassessment”+ Section 50C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai89Delhi84Jaipur72Ahmedabad51Hyderabad28Kolkata25Surat24Bangalore23Raipur23Indore19Chennai19Pune18Lucknow17Agra16Visakhapatnam13Nagpur13Rajkot10Guwahati10Chandigarh5Dehradun3Patna3Jodhpur3Jabalpur2Cuttack2Amritsar2Panaji1Allahabad1Varanasi1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 153C27Addition to Income10Section 2509Section 689Section 40A(3)9Section 369Depreciation9Disallowance9Section 1473Section 50C

SHREE PRAKSH SINGH,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIGBOI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 14/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.14/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri S. P. Bhati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Sen, JCIT, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 50C(1)

1. For that the Learned CIT(Appeals) is not justified in upholding the validity of assessment even though reassessment proceedings was initiated when the time limit for issue of notice u/s 143(2) has not expired and regular assessment could have been made. 2. For that the learned Assessing Officer has grossly erred in facts and in law in making

2

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 112/GTY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 117/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 114/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 118/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 110/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 116/GTY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

50C these cannot be treated as incriminating. Further our assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) for the A.Y 14-15 in which one of the major property has been purchased & AO in the assessment order has recorded finding also. Thereafter for the A.Y 2017-18 also scrutiny assessment has been made. ON MERIT OF THE CASE 14. That