BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

74 results for “reassessment”+ Section 43(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,877Mumbai1,289Chennai526Bangalore418Jaipur366Ahmedabad341Hyderabad259Kolkata226Chandigarh200Surat125Indore123Pune113Raipur103Amritsar100Rajkot96Cochin83Guwahati74Patna53Lucknow51Karnataka51Visakhapatnam50Cuttack50Nagpur44Telangana44Jodhpur35Ranchi31Dehradun29Agra26Allahabad24SC19Orissa7Calcutta5Kerala3Panaji3Rajasthan3Varanasi3Jabalpur2Uttarakhand1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 153C75Section 6869Section 153A67Section 14852Addition to Income49Section 25031Section 153D31Section 143(3)30Disallowance17Section 147

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. ARIHANT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED , GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 275/GTY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 43(5)Section 73

43(5) of the Act and also held that the “Mischief of explanation to Section 73 of the Act cannot be made applicable to include sale and purchase of derivatives into the ambit of explanation to Section 73 of the Act.” Further, ld. CIT(A) held that the re-assessment order framed for AY 2009-10 is merely

Showing 1–20 of 74 · Page 1 of 4

16
Depreciation14
Search & Seizure10

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

reassessment is not discernable from the finding. Therefore, the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) justifying the additions computed at 6% of the contract receipt is not sustainable. In view of the above discussion, we summarize the result as under:- (a) Section 153A starts with an non-obstante clause, i.e. notwithstanding. Hence once a search has been conducted upon

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

reassessment is not discernable from the finding. Therefore, the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) justifying the additions computed at 6% of the contract receipt is not sustainable. In view of the above discussion, we summarize the result as under:- (a) Section 153A starts with an non-obstante clause, i.e. notwithstanding. Hence once a search has been conducted upon

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

43,45,000/- 2018-19 22,95,000/- 2019-20 40,27,500/- 2020-21 36,17,000/- Basis of Addition Survey at the premises of lender on same day when Survey was carried out at our premises and in which lender could not give satisfactory reply. c) The AO has made addition in respect of undisclosed sales (impounded papers/documents