BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 249(4)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai284Delhi265Jaipur87Kolkata84Ahmedabad74Bangalore67Chennai53Chandigarh38Nagpur36Indore31Raipur29Pune28Hyderabad28Surat26Amritsar24Patna20Ranchi14Panaji10Jabalpur7Lucknow6Cochin6Visakhapatnam5Jodhpur4Rajkot4Cuttack3Guwahati3SC2Dehradun2Varanasi1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 1479Section 143(3)5Section 1483Reassessment3Addition to Income3Section 1532Section 153C2Section 50C2Search & Seizure2

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

b) whether ld. Assessing Officer was possessing any material, which can enable him to form a belief that income has escaped assessment. The answer to the second question would arise upon the finding of the first question. In case, it is held that ld. Assessing Officer was having jurisdiction to issue notice under section 148, inspite of procedure contemplated

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

b) whether ld. Assessing Officer was possessing any material, which can enable him to form a belief that income has escaped assessment. The answer to the second question would arise upon the finding of the first question. In case, it is held that ld. Assessing Officer was having jurisdiction to issue notice under section 148, inspite of procedure contemplated

SHREE PRAKSH SINGH,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIGBOI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 14/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.14/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri S. P. Bhati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Sen, JCIT, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 50C(1)

4) of the Act(belated return). According to Shri S. P. Bhati,ld. Counsel for the assessee, the Assessing Officer had time to issue notice under section 143(2) of the Act on or before 30.09.2014. However, the Assessing Officer issued notice under section 148 of the Act, on 21.06.2014, which action of the Assessing Officer is illegal and invalid