BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

18 results for “reassessment”+ Section 245clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi143Mumbai136Chennai102Bangalore74Jaipur35Kolkata26Ahmedabad22Hyderabad21Raipur20Chandigarh19Guwahati18Nagpur17Rajkot17Allahabad16Pune12Jodhpur10Lucknow8Surat7Cochin7Patna7Dehradun5Amritsar4Indore2Cuttack1Ranchi1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 684Section 2502Section 1322Section 139(1)2Section 143(2)2Addition to Income2Search & Seizure2

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

245/- per share in 2005. The movement of quoted price of TFCIL as per the quotation of CSE was enclosed. (iii) That the shares of TFCIL were held by the Assessee for more than one year. During F.Y 2011-12 relevant to CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) A.Y. 2012-13, the shares were sold

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

ITA 72/GTY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250Section 68

reassessment is that there is no need to resort to Section 147 of the I. T. Act and to consider the disallowance in the assessment to be made under section 153 of the I.T. Act? 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in misinterpreting the CBDT's Circular

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

ITA 73/GTY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250Section 68

reassessment is that there is no need to resort to Section 147 of the I. T. Act and to consider the disallowance in the assessment to be made under section 153 of the I.T. Act? 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in misinterpreting the CBDT's Circular