Search: reassessment

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai165 Delhi105 Bangalore59 Ahmedabad41 Hyderabad33 Raipur21 Jaipur20 Surat19 Rajkot15 Kolkata13 Chennai13 Dehradun9 Pune6 Patna3 Guwahati3 Chandigarh3 Indore2 Nagpur1 Cuttack1 Lucknow1 Ranchi1 SC1 Amritsar1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8 Section 143(2)4 Section 1424 Section 153(1)2 Section 143(1)2 Limitation/Time-bar2

SHRI BIMAL PAUL,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 8/GTY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT

Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153(1)

234D of the Act, are recorded in the body of the assessment order leading to the eventual quantification of the amount payable at Rs.15,16,830/-. This is the same amount that has been recorded in the corresponding Notice of Demand dated March 12, 2013, issued to the appellant by the Assessing Officer vide his office Memo No. AJMPP9568K/W-1/Sil/1879. Hence

SHRI BIMAL PAUL,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR

SHRI BIMAL PAUL,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR

SHRI BIMAL PAUL,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- JORHAT, JORHAT vs. M/S. TOOR FINANCE COMPANY LTD,, JORHAT