BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi678Mumbai624Bangalore309Ahmedabad120Jaipur95Chennai88Hyderabad84Kolkata70Pune49Agra29Rajkot28Indore26Surat23Cochin22Nagpur21Dehradun19Lucknow19Chandigarh18Visakhapatnam17Patna14Amritsar14Allahabad10Cuttack8Ranchi7Karnataka7Guwahati5Jodhpur4SC3Raipur3Telangana2Panaji1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 6810Section 234B9Section 143(3)6Section 234C6Section 153D5Addition to Income4Section 153C3Section 1483Natural Justice3Capital Gains

SMT. MOUMITA SAHA ,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA , AGARTALA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 239/GTY/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Apr 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg

Section 1Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153(1)(b)Section 153BSection 153B(1)(b)Section 153CSection 153DSection 69

234B and 234C of the Act being not in accordance with the law, the same is bad in law and is liable to be deleted. 7. For that your appellant craves leave of your honours to take additional ground or grounds and/or to modify any ground(s) of appeal at or before the time of hearing.” 2 I.T.A. No.239/Gau/2017

3
Section 2502
Reassessment2

SMT. SARAJ DEVI BAWRI ,DIMAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - DIMAPUR , DIMAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 226/GTY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati04 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 139(5)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 208Section 234BSection 234C

reassessment notice, return was filed in this respect and taxes were paid. The AO while completing the assessment u/s. 143(3)/147 of the Act has accepted the returned income. However, interest u/s. 234B at Rs.18,58,833/- and u/s. 234C at Rs.1,35,913/- have been levied. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who dismissed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- JORHAT, JORHAT vs. M/S. TOOR FINANCE COMPANY LTD,, JORHAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 305/GTY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148

reassessment had been initiated. In other two grounds, the ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the additions on merit also and the Revenue is challenging the finding of the ld. CIT(Appeals). 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed its return of income on 27.12.2010 declaring total income at Rs.57,652/-. This return was processed under

INDER CHAND SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 49/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

234B and 234C of the Act. 16. For the above and other grounds and reasons which may be submitted during hearing of the appeal, the assessee requests that the appeal be allowed as prayed and justice be rendered.” 4. The common grievance of the two different assessees namely Inderchand Sand and Saroj Devi Sand is that ld. CIT(A) erred

SAROJ DEVI SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOEM TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 51/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

234B and 234C of the Act. 16. For the above and other grounds and reasons which may be submitted during hearing of the appeal, the assessee requests that the appeal be allowed as prayed and justice be rendered.” 4. The common grievance of the two different assessees namely Inderchand Sand and Saroj Devi Sand is that ld. CIT(A) erred