BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

101 results for “reassessment”+ Section 15clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,460Mumbai3,688Chennai1,242Bangalore1,103Jaipur756Kolkata755Ahmedabad687Hyderabad653Pune413Chandigarh381Surat321Amritsar270Indore266Raipur264Visakhapatnam233Rajkot200Cochin187Cuttack177Karnataka125Nagpur123Patna118Agra103Guwahati101Lucknow96Dehradun81Telangana77Ranchi61Jodhpur61Allahabad49SC38Panaji31Calcutta19Jabalpur19Orissa12Rajasthan9Kerala7Varanasi5Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2J&K1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 153C81Section 6880Section 14876Section 153A72Addition to Income72Section 25053Section 143(3)53Section 14749Section 153D36Disallowance

AMPLEX PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,AGARTALA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE SILCHAR, SILCHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in above terms

ITA 333/GTY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A).

For Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl. CIT
Section 1Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245DSection 245D(4)Section 250

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the Assessing Officer in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A However, the completed/unabated assessments can be reopened by the Assessing

Showing 1–20 of 101 · Page 1 of 6

20
Reassessment19
Reopening of Assessment16

MAYURPLY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.,HOOGHLY, WEST BENGAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result IT(SS)A Nos

ITA 224/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati24 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kaushik Roy, DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 253Section 253(5)

15 & 16, it is held as under: "15.On a plain reading of section 153A of the Act, it is evident that the trigger point for exercise of powers thereunder is a search under section 132 or a requisition under section 132A of the Act. Once a search or requisition is made, a mandate is cast upon the Assessing Officer

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH vs. SANTOSH BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the cross- objection filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 104/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati13 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 104/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Assistant Commissioner Of Income Smt. Santosh Bamalwa Tax, Circle-1, Dibrugarh Vs Ground Floor Mahalaya Road C/O A.K. Varma Dibrugarh - 786001 [Pan: Aedpb9900P] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) C.O. No. 34/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Smt. Santosh Bamalwa Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Dibrugarh Vs Ground Floor Mahalaya Road C/O A.K. Varma Dibrugarh - 786001 [Pan: Aedpb9900P] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Arun Bhowmick, Jcit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 01/11/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Filed By The Revenue & The Cross-Objection Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Central, North-East Region, Guwahati (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 14/07/2023, Passed U/S

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, D/R
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 68

section 153, the assessment or reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to sub- I.T.A. No. 104/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 C.O. No. 34/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Smt. Santosh Bamalwa 15

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

15. The ld. Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation of the assessee. He was of the view that the claim of the assessee is bogus and thereupon he assessed it. He denied the claim of exemption under section 10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made

NAMITA MALLA SARKAR,AGARTALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-UDAIPUR, AGARTALA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 426/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.426/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2016-17)

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Jayanta Mridha, JCIT, Sr. D.R
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

15, 1st Floor, Bye Lane-2, Shaktigarh Path, Bhangagarh, G. S. Road,Tripura "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: JMYPS 2941 K (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Rahul Jain, A.R. Respondent by : Shri Jayanta Mridha, JCIT, Sr. D.R. सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 10/09/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 09 /10/2020 आदेश