BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 270A(9)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai93Delhi72Chennai49Jaipur46Bangalore45Cochin27Pune27Ahmedabad21Hyderabad21Rajkot16Cuttack13Indore13Patna12Raipur11Agra10Nagpur8Surat8Amritsar7Lucknow7Visakhapatnam4Chandigarh3Ranchi3Allahabad2Guwahati2Dehradun2Jodhpur2

Key Topics

Section 271A8Section 153A6Section 2502Section 139(1)2Section 132(1)2Section 132(4)2House Property2Penalty2Addition to Income

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 256/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

u/s 271AAB amounting to Rs. 51,00,000/- levied by the AO is hereby confirmed. Ground No. 1 is dismissed accordingly.” 9. In the grounds of appeal, the assessee has stated that the penalty is not leviable in as much as it is not the ‘specified previous year’. In this context it is relevant to refer to the definition

2
Search & Seizure2

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

u/s 271AAB amounting to Rs. 51,00,000/- levied by the AO is hereby confirmed. Ground No. 1 is dismissed accordingly.” 9. In the grounds of appeal, the assessee has stated that the penalty is not leviable in as much as it is not the ‘specified previous year’. In this context it is relevant to refer to the definition