BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi572Mumbai431Jaipur186Ahmedabad126Bangalore121Karnataka102Chennai83Indore82Kolkata79Pune53Hyderabad52Raipur38Chandigarh36Calcutta35Visakhapatnam32Rajkot28Allahabad20Surat19Lucknow17Amritsar17Nagpur16Cuttack15Cochin11Agra9Dehradun8Jodhpur5Ranchi5Jabalpur5Guwahati5SC3Rajasthan2Telangana1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271A8Section 143(3)6Section 153A6Section 153D6Section 2634Section 139(4)4Section 271(1)(c)3Section 1443Penalty3Addition to Income

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 256/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

263 CTR 1 (SC)[30-10-2013], wherein it has been held that voluntary disclosure does not relieve the assessee from the mischief of penal proceeding u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Thus, in the case of the assessee, the penalty was liable to be levied as per the provisions of sub-section

3
House Property2
Search & Seizure2

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

263 CTR 1 (SC)[30-10-2013], wherein it has been held that voluntary disclosure does not relieve the assessee from the mischief of penal proceeding u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Thus, in the case of the assessee, the penalty was liable to be levied as per the provisions of sub-section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. MEGHALAYA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, LUMJINGSHAI, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 308/GTY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Mar 2026AY 2016-17
Section 139(4)Section 139(9)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 72Section 80Section 80I

263 of the Act\nfor fresh adjudication and in the assessment proceedings the Id. AO\nobserved that the assessee filed the ITR u/s 139(4) of the Act on\n07.10.2017, along with tax audit report belatedly and therefore, the\nbusiness loss claimed by the assessee is not allowable as per the\nprovisions of Section 80IA of the Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA , AGARTALA vs. SHRI SUBHAJIT PAUL, AGARTALA

In the result, cross-objection nos

ITA 116/GTY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati31 Jul 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.116/Gau/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Rockein Saikia, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Modi, FCA
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153D

penalty was held as procedurally defective. The provisions laid down u/s. 153D of the Act under consideration in the present case before us, are different as here the prior approval of Joint Commissioner is not required merely for direction for payment of the due amount of tax but overall approval of the assessment framed by the I.T.O. Thus, the cited

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - NORTH LAKHIMPUR, NORTH LAKHIMPUR vs. TAMCHI KUSUK, ITANAGAR

In the result, the appeal as well as Cross Objection both are dismissed

ITA 176/GTY/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Nov 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 10(26)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 263

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) initiated separately. Copy of order to the assessee. 30.12.2009 (Mrinal K. Das) Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Cir.-Tezpur 5. Dissatisfied with the above computation of income, the assessee went in appeal before the ld. CIT(Appeals). The ld. CIT(Appeals) held that the assessee is entitled for exemption under section