BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 2(14)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,284Mumbai1,071Jaipur358Ahmedabad310Hyderabad239Bangalore221Chennai214Indore193Pune166Raipur166Surat161Kolkata161Chandigarh125Rajkot104Amritsar85Nagpur76Cochin52Allahabad51Lucknow45Visakhapatnam44Cuttack33Patna29Guwahati28Dehradun27Ranchi24Agra16Panaji16Jodhpur15Jabalpur8Varanasi4

Key Topics

Section 25030Section 10(26)30Section 271(1)24Section 271(1)(c)21Addition to Income18Section 271A17Penalty17Section 27116Section 153A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. HITECH CONSTRUCTION, DHUBRI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 133/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

2,20,04,050/- in the return filed in compliance to the notice u/s 153A of the Act. Ld. AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act accepting the income declared by the assessee. However, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act and vide penalty order dated 28.06.2019 penalty

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

15
Section 143(3)11
Disallowance7
Cash Deposit6

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. HITECH CONSTRUCTION, DHUBRI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 135/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

2,20,04,050/- in the return filed in compliance to the notice u/s 153A of the Act. Ld. AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act accepting the income declared by the assessee. However, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act and vide penalty order dated 28.06.2019 penalty

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. HITECH CONSTRUCTION, DHUBRI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 134/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

2,20,04,050/- in the return filed in compliance to the notice u/s 153A of the Act. Ld. AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act accepting the income declared by the assessee. However, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act and vide penalty order dated 28.06.2019 penalty

SHREEMATI KENE WELLY,ITANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, NORTH LAKHIMPUR

In the result, the both the appeals filed by the assessees in I

ITA 179/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(26)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the “Act”) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Guwahati-1, Guwahati [in short ld. “CIT(A)”] dated 24.09.2020. 2. The assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds: “1. For that the penalty order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals

SHRI TAKING WELLY,ITANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, NORTH LAKHIMPUR

In the result, the both the appeals filed by the assessees in I

ITA 175/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(26)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the “Act”) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Guwahati-1, Guwahati [in short ld. “CIT(A)”] dated 24.09.2020. 2. The assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds: “1. For that the penalty order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

2) No penalty under the provisions of section 270A or clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (1A). (3) The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 256/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

2) No penalty under the provisions of section 270A or clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (1A). (3) The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation

M/S. ASSAM TEA CORPORATION LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 85/GTY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Sri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 150(1)Section 150(2)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

14. In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Now, we take up I.T.A. No.: 85/GTY/2020. 15. The present appeal is a penalty appeal. The grievance of the assessee is that ld. CIT(A) has erred in initiating the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Sub-Section 3 of Section 271

M/S. ASSAM TEA CORPORATION LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 216/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Sri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 150(1)Section 150(2)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

14. In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Now, we take up I.T.A. No.: 85/GTY/2020. 15. The present appeal is a penalty appeal. The grievance of the assessee is that ld. CIT(A) has erred in initiating the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Sub-Section 3 of Section 271

SHYAMASHREE FINVEST (P) LTD,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD7(3), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in I

ITA 106/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 124Section 143(2)Section 250Section 271Section 68

penalty of Rs. 1,16,71,115/- made by the assessing officer U/s 271 (1)(c) on account of unverifiable investment. 2. That your appellant craves leave of your honour to take additional ground or grounds of appeal or to modify any grounds of appeal at or before the time of hearing.” 3. First we take up the quantum appeal

SHYAMASHREE FINVEST (P) LTD,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD7(3), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in I

ITA 105/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 124Section 143(2)Section 250Section 271Section 68

penalty of Rs. 1,16,71,115/- made by the assessing officer U/s 271 (1)(c) on account of unverifiable investment. 2. That your appellant craves leave of your honour to take additional ground or grounds of appeal or to modify any grounds of appeal at or before the time of hearing.” 3. First we take up the quantum appeal

SHRI MANOJ KUMAR JAJODIA,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SHILLONG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 37/GTY/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)Section 274

2. The assessee has challenged the order of Ld. CIT(A) on the legal issue as well as on merit. The legal issue raised by the assessee is that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the order of AO passed u/s 271(1)(c ) of the Act wherein the AO has not recorded a finding whether the penalty

SHRI MANOJ KUMAR JAJODIA,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SHILLONG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 35/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)Section 274

2. The assessee has challenged the order of Ld. CIT(A) on the legal issue as well as on merit. The legal issue raised by the assessee is that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the order of AO passed u/s 271(1)(c ) of the Act wherein the AO has not recorded a finding whether the penalty

SHRI MANOJ KUMAR JAJODIA,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SHILLONG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 36/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)Section 274

2. The assessee has challenged the order of Ld. CIT(A) on the legal issue as well as on merit. The legal issue raised by the assessee is that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the order of AO passed u/s 271(1)(c ) of the Act wherein the AO has not recorded a finding whether the penalty

SHRI MANOJ KUMAR JAJODIA,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SHILLONG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 34/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)Section 274

2. The assessee has challenged the order of Ld. CIT(A) on the legal issue as well as on merit. The legal issue raised by the assessee is that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the order of AO passed u/s 271(1)(c ) of the Act wherein the AO has not recorded a finding whether the penalty

NYANYA GOLLO,ITANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TEZPUR

In the result, ITA No. 110/Gau/2020 is allowed and ITA No

ITA 110/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 10(26)Section 250Section 251(2)Section 271(1)(c)

271(1)(c) of the Act respectively. 2. First we take up ITA No. 110/Gau/2020. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that the Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in upholding addition of Rs.29,08,124/- out of total addition of Rs.43,53,053/- made by assessing officer. 2. For that

NYANYA GOLLO,ITANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TEZPUR

In the result, ITA No. 110/Gau/2020 is allowed and ITA No

ITA 167/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 10(26)Section 250Section 251(2)Section 271(1)(c)

271(1)(c) of the Act respectively. 2. First we take up ITA No. 110/Gau/2020. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that the Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in upholding addition of Rs.29,08,124/- out of total addition of Rs.43,53,053/- made by assessing officer. 2. For that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 2/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

u/s 250 of the Act dated 27.07.2022 running into 1017 pages allowing the deduction claimed u/s.80IA of the Act and the crux of his finding is summarized as under: “(i) That, in respect of an assessment year whose proceedings had abated, a Return of Income filed in compliance to the Notice issued u/s 153A of the Act, substitutes the prior/earlier

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 37/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

u/s 250 of the Act dated 27.07.2022 running into 1017 pages allowing the deduction claimed u/s.80IA of the Act and the crux of his finding is summarized as under: “(i) That, in respect of an assessment year whose proceedings had abated, a Return of Income filed in compliance to the Notice issued u/s 153A of the Act, substitutes the prior/earlier

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 39/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

u/s 250 of the Act dated 27.07.2022 running into 1017 pages allowing the deduction claimed u/s.80IA of the Act and the crux of his finding is summarized as under: “(i) That, in respect of an assessment year whose proceedings had abated, a Return of Income filed in compliance to the Notice issued u/s 153A of the Act, substitutes the prior/earlier