ARUNACHAL POLICE HOUSING & WELFARE CORPORATION LIMITED,PAPUMPARE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-ITANAGAR, ITANAGAR
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 117/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Apr 2023AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Girish Agrawal, Hon’Ble
For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT, D/R
Section 10Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274
Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, specifically requires recording of satisfaction for initiation of penalty which has to be “in the course of any proceedings under the Act”. According to ld. Counsel for assessee, ld. Assessing
AY 2016-17
Arunachal Police Housing & Welfare Corp. Ltd.
3
Officer has not recorded any satisfaction in the assessment order passed u/s 143