BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 10(46)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi452Mumbai421Jaipur131Raipur121Ahmedabad118Bangalore118Hyderabad88Chennai76Indore64Rajkot57Chandigarh51Pune33Surat31Allahabad24Nagpur22Kolkata21Amritsar20Lucknow19Visakhapatnam17Cuttack14Guwahati10Jodhpur4Dehradun3Ranchi3Cochin3Agra2Patna1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)15Section 2508Section 271A8Addition to Income8Section 153A6Section 44A5Section 143(3)5Depreciation5Disallowance

SHRI TAKING WELLY,ITANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, NORTH LAKHIMPUR

In the result, the both the appeals filed by the assessees in I

ITA 175/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(26)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

46,037/- under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is bad in law and liable to be deleted. 10. For that on the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned penalty order being passed in haste and without allowing any proper and reasonable opportunity of being heard, the same is bad in law and liable to be quashed

SHREEMATI KENE WELLY,ITANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, NORTH LAKHIMPUR

In the result, the both the appeals filed by the assessees in I

5
Penalty5
Section 2742
Section 2712
ITA 179/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(26)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

46,037/- under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is bad in law and liable to be deleted. 10. For that on the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned penalty order being passed in haste and without allowing any proper and reasonable opportunity of being heard, the same is bad in law and liable to be quashed

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 256/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

46,33,570/- u/s 153A of the Act and also held that as during the search operation various incriminating documents were found, out of which some documents related to the sum of ₹1,70,00,000/- as the undisclosed the rental income, hence he inferred that the assessee had concealed his income for the year under consideration by not disclosing

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

46,33,570/- u/s 153A of the Act and also held that as during the search operation various incriminating documents were found, out of which some documents related to the sum of ₹1,70,00,000/- as the undisclosed the rental income, hence he inferred that the assessee had concealed his income for the year under consideration by not disclosing

HYDRO POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH LIMITED,ITANAGAR vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE TEZPUR, TEZPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 72/GTY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 144Section 147Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

46,670/- under Section 147 read with section 144 of the Act. Admittedly, this determination was done on an allegedly invalid return. Thereafter, the Ld. AO proceeded to levy of penalty of Rs. 39,08,542/- under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Here it needs to be mentioned that for A.Y. 2013-14 the facts are the same

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 39/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

46 of 114 I.T.A. No.: 43/GTY/2022 I.T.A. No.: 2/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 I.T.A. Nos.: 37, 38 & 39/GTY/2022 AYs: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20 ABCI Infrastructure Private Limited. years in appeal before ld. CIT(A) challenging the disallowance of assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act in respect of the above years. 57. Before

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 38/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

46 of 114 I.T.A. No.: 43/GTY/2022 I.T.A. No.: 2/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 I.T.A. Nos.: 37, 38 & 39/GTY/2022 AYs: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20 ABCI Infrastructure Private Limited. years in appeal before ld. CIT(A) challenging the disallowance of assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act in respect of the above years. 57. Before

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 37/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

46 of 114 I.T.A. No.: 43/GTY/2022 I.T.A. No.: 2/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 I.T.A. Nos.: 37, 38 & 39/GTY/2022 AYs: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20 ABCI Infrastructure Private Limited. years in appeal before ld. CIT(A) challenging the disallowance of assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act in respect of the above years. 57. Before

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 43/GTY/2022[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

46 of 114 I.T.A. No.: 43/GTY/2022 I.T.A. No.: 2/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 I.T.A. Nos.: 37, 38 & 39/GTY/2022 AYs: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20 ABCI Infrastructure Private Limited. years in appeal before ld. CIT(A) challenging the disallowance of assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act in respect of the above years. 57. Before

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 2/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

46 of 114 I.T.A. No.: 43/GTY/2022 I.T.A. No.: 2/GTY/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 I.T.A. Nos.: 37, 38 & 39/GTY/2022 AYs: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20 ABCI Infrastructure Private Limited. years in appeal before ld. CIT(A) challenging the disallowance of assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act in respect of the above years. 57. Before