BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

47 results for “house property”+ Section 8clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,987Delhi4,241Bangalore1,567Chennai1,205Ahmedabad840Jaipur838Karnataka819Kolkata786Hyderabad753Pune641Chandigarh449Surat335Indore322Cochin298Visakhapatnam288Telangana219Amritsar172Rajkot159Raipur138Lucknow114Cuttack113Nagpur112Agra79SC75Patna67Calcutta66Jodhpur59Guwahati47Allahabad37Dehradun32Varanasi25Rajasthan24Kerala20Ranchi15Jabalpur14Orissa9Panaji9Punjab & Haryana5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Andhra Pradesh2Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh2J&K1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Addition to Income28Section 143(3)19Section 25013Section 14711House Property11Section 69A9Section 153A9Section 271A8Section 1487

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 4, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. A. T. C. REALTORS PVT. LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 169/GTY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 169/Gau/2018 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2012-13) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 170/Gau/2018 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2013-14) Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, M/S Atc Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Circle-4, Aayakar Bhwawan, 5Th C/O. Atc Assam Ltd, Kedar Vs. Floor, Christanbasti, G.S. Road, Road, Machkhowa, Guwahati-781005 Guwahati-781001 (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. Aagca5209A

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Sengupta, JCITFor Respondent: Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate
Section 143Section 22

section 6, the fact that it may indirectly be covered by another head will not make the income taxable under the later head." Similar principle has been laid down by different High-courts in cases such as: Brijnath Brijmohan & Sons Pvt. Ltd. 161 ItR 234 (Bombay) CIT vs. New India Maritime Agencies (P) Ltd. 256 ITR 513 (Madras) Rampur Industries

Showing 1–20 of 47 · Page 1 of 3

Section 153C7
Deduction7
Disallowance7

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 4, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. A. T. C. REALTORS PVT. LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 170/GTY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 169/Gau/2018 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2012-13) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 170/Gau/2018 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2013-14) Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, M/S Atc Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Circle-4, Aayakar Bhwawan, 5Th C/O. Atc Assam Ltd, Kedar Vs. Floor, Christanbasti, G.S. Road, Road, Machkhowa, Guwahati-781005 Guwahati-781001 (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. Aagca5209A

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Sengupta, JCITFor Respondent: Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate
Section 143Section 22

section 6, the fact that it may indirectly be covered by another head will not make the income taxable under the later head." Similar principle has been laid down by different High-courts in cases such as: Brijnath Brijmohan & Sons Pvt. Ltd. 161 ItR 234 (Bombay) CIT vs. New India Maritime Agencies (P) Ltd. 256 ITR 513 (Madras) Rampur Industries

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA vs. M/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 99/GTY/2000[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Dec 2022AY 1993-94

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble]

For Appellant: Smt. Harshita Jain on behalf of NituFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80G

house. Rather, it is with respect to transit flats given to the employees on transfers. The manufacturing activities of the assesse are such a place where it is difficult to find out any space to stay. The employees have to stay in the gardens where certain space is mandatory for the assessee to maintain. After considering the finding

M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. ,DIBRUGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 200/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

property, its guest house, charges for equipment and recoveries from the contractors on account of water and electricity supply. These items are covered by the decision in Bokaro Steel ltd.’s case (1999) 236 ITR 315 (SC). To the extent that it relates to these items, i.e., items excluding interest, the question must be answered in the affirmative

M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. ,DIBRUGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 94/GTY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Oct 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

property, its guest house, charges for equipment and recoveries from the contractors on account of water and electricity supply. These items are covered by the decision in Bokaro Steel ltd.’s case (1999) 236 ITR 315 (SC). To the extent that it relates to these items, i.e., items excluding interest, the question must be answered in the affirmative

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH vs. M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 89/GTY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Oct 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

property, its guest house, charges for equipment and recoveries from the contractors on account of water and electricity supply. These items are covered by the decision in Bokaro Steel ltd.’s case (1999) 236 ITR 315 (SC). To the extent that it relates to these items, i.e., items excluding interest, the question must be answered in the affirmative

AFSANA BEGUM,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati11 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 250Section 56

property situated at C-97, South Extension Part-Il, New Delhi jointly with her husband Sri. S.K. Datta for a consideration of ₹13,00,00,000/- (assessee’s investment share being 50% of the consideration). The assessee had submitted that the sources for the investment was out of housing loan availed from SBI jointly with her husband for an amount

SHREE PRAKSH SINGH,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIGBOI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 14/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.14/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri S. P. Bhati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Sen, JCIT, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 50C(1)

House Property’ and ‘Income from Other Sources’ only. However, information alongwith a copy of sale deed dated 10.09.2011was received regarding sale of commercialbuilding and land appurtenant thereto by the assessee during the 3 Shree Prakash Singh Assessment Year:2012-13 previous year relevant to the assessment year 2012-13. On perusal of the above Sale Deed dated

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 256/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

house property at the time of statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act on the basis of some documents related to the rental income, which were found and seized during the course of the search which was subsequently I.T.A. Nos.: 256 & 257/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-21 & 2021-22 Bhagya Kalita. disclosed in the return of income filed in response

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

house property at the time of statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act on the basis of some documents related to the rental income, which were found and seized during the course of the search which was subsequently I.T.A. Nos.: 256 & 257/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-21 & 2021-22 Bhagya Kalita. disclosed in the return of income filed in response

SUBHASH CHAND CHORARIA,GUWAHATI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 63/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A

house property, most of which was received by cheque and interest on bank deposits and the miscellaneous receipts. It was submitted that the entire cash in hand was tax paid income and there is no limit even under the I.T. Act or any other law as to how much money could be withdrawn and kept at home

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SHILLONG vs. SATINDER SINGH DHARIWAL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 17/GTY/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

House Property Rs. (-)88,200/- Gross total Income Rs. 4,79,070/- Deduction under Chapter VIA Rs. 1,50,000/- Total Income Rs. 3,29,070/- 6. Ld. AO noted, “it is ascertained that during the financial year 2015-16 had made accommodation entry of bogus long term capital gains in the form of penny stock by way of trading

SHRI RATAN SHARMA ,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed

ITA 98/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 131Section 143(3)

section 131 of the Income Act 1961 on 17.04.2013 in reply to question no. 26 had also stated that the investment in M//s Platinum Alloys Pvt. Ltd. was made by his group/associates. He further stated that all the investments made were duly recorded in the books of accounts. It will, thus, be clear that the entire funds

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. SHRI RATAN SHARMA , GUWAHATI

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed

ITA 71/GTY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 131Section 143(3)

section 131 of the Income Act 1961 on 17.04.2013 in reply to question no. 26 had also stated that the investment in M//s Platinum Alloys Pvt. Ltd. was made by his group/associates. He further stated that all the investments made were duly recorded in the books of accounts. It will, thus, be clear that the entire funds

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. SHRI RATAN SHARMA , GUWAHATI

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed

ITA 72/GTY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 131Section 143(3)

section 131 of the Income Act 1961 on 17.04.2013 in reply to question no. 26 had also stated that the investment in M//s Platinum Alloys Pvt. Ltd. was made by his group/associates. He further stated that all the investments made were duly recorded in the books of accounts. It will, thus, be clear that the entire funds

DIGANTA DEKA,GUWAHATI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 46/GTY/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 71(3)

section 71(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. And whereas an amount of Rs.51,750/- has been claimed as ‘Expenses on let out property’ and an amount of Rs.79,936/- has been claimed as ‘Expenses against Rental Income’ and allowed at the time of assessment, even though such expenses were not covered under Chapter IV of the Income

SMT. SANTOSH BAMALWA,DIBRUGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 348/GTY/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Mar 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri Rajesh Kumarsmt. Santosh Bamalwa Acit, Circle-1 C/O A.K. Varma, Ground Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, 2Nd Floor, Vs. Mahalaya Road, Dibrugarh- Milan Nagar, Dibrugarh-786003, 786001, Assam Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aedpb9900P Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing: 09/03/2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 13/03/2026 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl
Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

house property, short term capital gain and income from other sources. The assessee has sold 50,000 equity shares of Twenty First Century (India) Ltd. at a consideration of ₹ 1,54,08,134/- and claimed long term capital gain as exempt under Section 10(38) of the Act. The said shares were purchased by the assessee

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. BATH AND SANITARY, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 169/GTY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati30 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 147Section 148Section 68

house property was sold in 2001 and the payment for the same was received by draft and cheque in January/February 2001. This receipt was also about three and half years prior to the cash introduction of Rs. 6, 20, 000/- in the assessee firm. From this it can be seen that the assessee has failed to explain the immediate source

CARBON SPECIALITIES LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 26/GTY/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2009-10 Carbon Specialities Limited Dcit, Circle-2, Guwahati 53/10, Naya Ganj, Kanpur, Vs. Uttar Pradesh-208001. Pan: Aaacc 7924 J (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri S.P. Bhati, Fca Respondent By : Shri P.S. Thuingaleng, Acit. Date Of Hearing : 27.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement :.. 28.04.2022 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 28.02.2020 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -2, Guwahati [Hereinafter Referred To As The Cit(A)] Relevant To Ay 2009-10. 2. The Only Issue Raised By The Assessee Is Against The Confirmation Of Disallowance Of Rs. 8,44,556/- By Ld. Cit(A) As Made By The Ao U/S 14A Of The Act Relating To Earning Of Exempt Income.

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Bhati, FCAFor Respondent: Shri P.S. Thuingaleng, ACIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

section 14A of the Act and made a disallowance of Rs. 13,01,126/- comprising Rs. 3,60,365/- under Rule 8D(2)(i)& Rs. 9,40,461/- under Rule 8D(iii) in the assessment framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act dated 31.03.2015. In the appellate proceeding, ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the relief by sustaining

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 21/GTY/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68

8 I.T.A. No.21/Gau/2021 & CO No.1/Gau/2021 Fortune Vanijya Private Limited Assessment Year: 2011-12 9. Per contra, the Ld. Addl. CIT DR Shri Nongothung Jungio contended that there was no requirement in law for the AO to have pointed out the ‘asset’ to the assessee for which the relevant assessment year 2011-12 was being re-assessed u/s 153C read with