ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA vs. M/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI
In the result, appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee are dismissed
ITA 99/GTY/2000[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Dec 2022AY 1993-94
Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble]
For Appellant: Smt. Harshita Jain on behalf of NituFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80G
4). I, therefore, delete the disallowance of Rs.5,26,969/- following decisions cited above.
(10.5)
The ad-hoc disallowance in my view is unwarranted. The A/O has not brought on record any material for such disallowance. In fact, he himself has written off that the disallowance is made on the basis of possibility that the expenditure
