DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH vs. M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

section 10(5) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and whether the assessee will be entitled to depreciation allowances and development rebate with reference to such interest also. The Court held that the accepted accountancy rule for determining cost of fixed assets is to include all expenditure necessary to bring such assets into existence and to put them

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA vs. M/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble]

37(4). I, therefore, delete the disallowance of Rs.5,26,969/- following decisions cited above. (10.5) The ad-hoc disallowance in my view is unwarranted. The A/O has not brought on record any material for such disallowance. In fact, he himself has written off that the disallowance is made on the basis of possibility that the expenditure

SUBHASH CHAND CHORARIA,GUWAHATI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

house property and other sources. The case was selected for limited scrutiny through Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS), with the primary issue being the unexplained cash deposit of ₹37,00,000/- during the demonetization period. The Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'AO') observed that while the assessee received his rental income through banking channels, he had deposited

AFSANA BEGUM,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

property situated at C-97, South Extension Part-Il, New Delhi jointly with her husband Sri. S.K. Datta for a consideration of ₹13,00,00,000/- (assessee’s investment share being 50% of the consideration). The assessee had submitted that the sources for the investment was out of housing loan availed from SBI jointly with her husband for an amount

L.K. TEA COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,DIBRUGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

House, NH 37, Natun [PAN No. AAACL 9045 P] Gaon, P.O. Mohanghat, Dibrugarh- 786008 . .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri M.C. Ome Ningshen, JCIT-SR-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Revenue 09-12-2019 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-12-2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

L.K. TEA COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,DIBRUGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

House, NH 37, Natun [PAN No. AAACL 9045 P] Gaon, P.O. Mohanghat, Dibrugarh- 786008 . .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri M.C. Ome Ningshen, JCIT-SR-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Revenue 09-12-2019 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-12-2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

37. On a conspectus of section 153A(1) of the Act, read with the provisos thereto, and in the light of the law explained in the aforementioned decisions, the legal position that emerges is as under: 32 I.T.A. No.21/Gau/2021 & CO No.1/Gau/2021 Fortune Vanijya Private Limited Assessment Year: 2011-12 Once a search takes place under section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. BRAHMAPUTRA FINLEASE PRIVATE LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the cross- objection filed by the Assessee is Partly Allowed

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble & Shri Rakesh Mishra, Hon’Ble

House South West Delhi New Delhi – 110037 PAN : AAACK3691G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Vivek Malhotra, FCA Department By: Soumendu Sekhar Das, JCIT Date of Hearing: 30.12.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 28 .01.2025 ORDER PER MANOMOHAN DAS, JM This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Central, North Eastern Region, Guwahati (hereinafter

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - DIMAPUR , DIMAPUR vs. M/S. UDIPTA ENERGY & EQUIPMENT PVT. LTD., ASSAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं. /Ita No. 45/Gau/2017 (Ǔ""ȡ[""""[/ Assessment Year 2013-14) The Dy. Commissioner Of Income- M/S Udipta Energy & Equipment Tax, Circle, Dimapur, Nagaland Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C/O Phukan Nagar, Sivasagar, Assam-785640 (\ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ/ Assessee) (Ĥ×"ȡ"Ȣ- / Respondent) .. È"ȡ"Ȣलेखासं./Pan No. Aaacu5559K \ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ"Ȧओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri Rabindro Singh, Jcit Ĥ×""ȸ"Ȧओरसे/ Respondent By : Shri Uttam Kr. Borthakur, Advocate

section 69C relates to the source of the expenditure which is M/s Udipta Energy & Equipment Pvt. Ltd. unexplained, and that it is a deeming provision and not about whether the expenditure incurred relates to business or not. We note that the Expenditure of Rs. 17,32,595/- on account of business are either made by cash or cheque which

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September