BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

35 results for “house property”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,857Delhi2,363Bangalore829Jaipur534Chennai530Hyderabad452Ahmedabad358Pune318Chandigarh272Kolkata270Indore201Cochin186Surat120Rajkot116Visakhapatnam103Raipur100Nagpur93Amritsar89Lucknow87SC86Patna68Agra61Jodhpur42Cuttack39Guwahati35Allahabad18Dehradun18Jabalpur14Varanasi12Ranchi8Panaji7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Addition to Income16Section 143(3)13Section 25012Section 69A11House Property9Section 1478Section 271A8Section 1486Section 153A6

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

2) are specified, have held that penalty under sub-section (1) of section 271AAA of the Act was not attracted on the said amount. However, there is no such exclusionary provision mentioned in section 271AAB of the Act so as to exclude the imposition of penalty upon certain conditions being fulfilled. Hence, he emphasised that the decision relied upon being

Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2

Disallowance6
Section 685
Depreciation5

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 256/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 250Section 271A

2) are specified, have held that penalty under sub-section (1) of section 271AAA of the Act was not attracted on the said amount. However, there is no such exclusionary provision mentioned in section 271AAB of the Act so as to exclude the imposition of penalty upon certain conditions being fulfilled. Hence, he emphasised that the decision relied upon being

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

AFSANA BEGUM,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati11 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 250Section 56

property situated at C-97, South Extension Part-Il, New Delhi jointly with her husband Sri. S.K. Datta for a consideration of ₹13,00,00,000/- (assessee’s investment share being 50% of the consideration). The assessee had submitted that the sources for the investment was out of housing loan availed from SBI jointly with her husband for an amount

RANEE NARAH ,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR -2 GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 147/GTY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) On The Basis Of Following Findings:

Section 23(4)Section 250Section 68Section 69A

house property of the appellant to taxed. Accordingly, the ground No. 2 of the appeal is dismissed. 7.3.1 The fundamental question involved is that whether or not the AO was justified in making the addition of Rs. 1,71,85,500/- under section