M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. ,DIBRUGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

15,802 Nil 2015-16 22.09.2015 Nil 6,99,57,852 1,90,39,000 Nil 6. We have heard rival submissions and gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. We note that AO relying on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. CIT (1997) 227 ITR 172 (SC), held

M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. ,DIBRUGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

15,802 Nil 2015-16 22.09.2015 Nil 6,99,57,852 1,90,39,000 Nil 6. We have heard rival submissions and gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. We note that AO relying on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. CIT (1997) 227 ITR 172 (SC), held

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH vs. M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

15,802 Nil 2015-16 22.09.2015 Nil 6,99,57,852 1,90,39,000 Nil 6. We have heard rival submissions and gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. We note that AO relying on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. CIT (1997) 227 ITR 172 (SC), held

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

house property in order to have peace of mind and to avoid litigation and penalties. The disclosure was made on the basis of the loose sheets which were found during the search and the same were not verifiable to be genuine and the Investigating Officer also verified from the various parties/sources whose names appear on these loose papers

BHAGYA KALITA,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

house property in order to have peace of mind and to avoid litigation and penalties. The disclosure was made on the basis of the loose sheets which were found during the search and the same were not verifiable to be genuine and the Investigating Officer also verified from the various parties/sources whose names appear on these loose papers

SUBHASH CHAND CHORARIA,GUWAHATI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

house property, most of which was received by cheque and interest on bank deposits and the miscellaneous receipts. It was submitted that the entire cash in hand was tax paid income and there is no limit even under the I.T. Act or any other law as to how much money could be withdrawn and kept at home

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA vs. M/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble]

house. Rather, it is with respect to transit flats given to the employees on transfers. The manufacturing activities of the assesse are such a place where it is difficult to find out any space to stay. The employees have to stay in the gardens where certain space is mandatory for the assessee to maintain. After considering the finding

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. BATH AND SANITARY, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

section 147 of the Income-tax Act,1961 and needs to be examined.” 5. We observe from the reasons recorded as extracted above that the case of the assessee has been reopened on the ground that assessee is beneficiary of Rs. 15 lakh received from SDPL, Rs. 10 lakh on 19.08.2011 and Rs.5,00,000/- on 15.09.2011 aggregating

SYED IZAZUL HAQUE,GUWAHATI` vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assesseeis allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm Ito, Ward 3(4), Guwahati Syed Izazul Haque Aaykar Bhavan, G.S Road, House No.21, Near Darandamaszid, Panjabari Road, Christian Basti, Guwahati Vs. Guwahati-781037, Assam Pin-781005, Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aedph2934M Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Ar Revenue By : Shri Kausik Ray, Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.08.2025

House No.21, Near DarandaMaszid, panjabari Road, Christian Basti, Guwahati Vs. Guwahati-781037, Assam PIN-781005, Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN No. AEDPH2934M Assessee by : Shri Somnath Ghosh, AR Revenue by : Shri Kausik Ray, DR Date of hearing: 10.07.2025 Date of pronouncement: 26.08.2025 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, AM: This appeal preferred by the assessee against the order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

property being land or building or both, shares and securities, loans and advances, deposits in bank account. 13. From a reading of the aforesaid fourth proviso to Section 153A of the Act, it can be seen that the expression used by the Parliament, while enlarging the power of the AO to extend the jurisdiction u/s. 153A/153C of the Act from

L.K. TEA COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,DIBRUGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

House, NH 37, Natun [PAN No. AAACL 9045 P] Gaon, P.O. Mohanghat, Dibrugarh- 786008 . .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri M.C. Ome Ningshen, JCIT-SR-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Revenue 09-12-2019 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-12-2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

L.K. TEA COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,DIBRUGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

House, NH 37, Natun [PAN No. AAACL 9045 P] Gaon, P.O. Mohanghat, Dibrugarh- 786008 . .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri M.C. Ome Ningshen, JCIT-SR-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Revenue 09-12-2019 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-12-2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. BRAHMAPUTRA FINLEASE PRIVATE LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the cross- objection filed by the Assessee is Partly Allowed

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble & Shri Rakesh Mishra, Hon’Ble

House South West Delhi New Delhi – 110037 PAN : AAACK3691G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Vivek Malhotra, FCA Department By: Soumendu Sekhar Das, JCIT Date of Hearing: 30.12.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 28 .01.2025 ORDER PER MANOMOHAN DAS, JM This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Central, North Eastern Region, Guwahati (hereinafter

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Mohanaghat, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008 Appearances by: S/Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate and Sanjay Varma, FCA and A.K. Varma, ITP, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing : August 28, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order : September