BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

25 results for “house property”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai568Delhi452Jaipur172Chennai169Bangalore136Hyderabad123Pune111Chandigarh106Ahmedabad73Cochin66Raipur62Kolkata61Rajkot46Indore39Amritsar33Nagpur30Visakhapatnam30Patna30Lucknow27Surat25Guwahati25Agra18SC16Cuttack12Jodhpur10Dehradun5Ranchi4Panaji2Varanasi2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Allahabad1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1477Section 2507Addition to Income7Section 143(3)6Section 44A5Depreciation5Disallowance5Section 1484Section 684

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. BATH AND SANITARY, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 169/GTY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati30 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 147Section 148Section 68

reopening of assessment cannot be sustained. The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs R.B. Wadkar (No. 1) in 2004 137 TAXMAN 479 (Bom) has held the reasons have to be read as recorded and there cannot be any substitution or addition or deletion to the reasons. Therefore , we do not find any infirmity

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

Section 153C3
Reopening of Assessment2
Unexplained Cash Credit2
ITAT Guwahati
01 Sept 2023
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

reopen and/or assess the return with respect to six preceding years; however, there must be some incriminating material available with the Assessing Officer with respect to the sale transactions in the particular assessment year. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) 20. For the foregoing reasons, it is not possible to state that the impugned order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. BRAHMAPUTRA FINLEASE PRIVATE LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the cross- objection filed by the Assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 110/GTY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble & Shri Rakesh Mishra, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Vivek Malhotra, FCAFor Respondent: Soumendu Sekhar Das, JCIT
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250Section 68

House South West Delhi New Delhi – 110037 PAN : AAACK3691G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Vivek Malhotra, FCA Department By: Soumendu Sekhar Das, JCIT Date of Hearing: 30.12.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 28 .01.2025 ORDER PER MANOMOHAN DAS, JM This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Central, North Eastern Region, Guwahati (hereinafter

SMT. SANTOSH BAMALWA,DIBRUGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 348/GTY/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Mar 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri Rajesh Kumarsmt. Santosh Bamalwa Acit, Circle-1 C/O A.K. Varma, Ground Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, 2Nd Floor, Vs. Mahalaya Road, Dibrugarh- Milan Nagar, Dibrugarh-786003, 786001, Assam Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aedpb9900P Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing: 09/03/2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 13/03/2026 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl
Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

house property, short term capital gain and income from other sources. The assessee has sold 50,000 equity shares of Twenty First Century (India) Ltd. at a consideration of ₹ 1,54,08,134/- and claimed long term capital gain as exempt under Section 10(38) of the Act. The said shares were purchased by the assessee

PANKAJ KUMAR,KARNAL vs. CIT (APPEALS), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 173/GTY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati15 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble & Shri Sanjay Awasthi, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Daljit Singh, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Kausik Ray JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

House No. 583, Ward 3, Dera Hasanpur Road Gharunda, District- Karnal PIN-132114 (Haryana) PAN: ARWPK9368A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Daljit Singh, FCA Department By: Shri Kausik Ray JCIT Date of Hearing: 21-08-2025 Date of Pronouncement: 15 .10.2025 ORDER PER MANOMOHAN DAS, JM The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income