BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 801B(10)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai95Delhi36Rajkot34Indore20Pune14Jaipur8Ahmedabad7Chennai7Lucknow6Hyderabad5Nagpur4Surat3Amritsar3Cochin3Guwahati3Jodhpur3Dehradun2Ranchi2Jabalpur1Raipur1Chandigarh1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 80I21Section 36(1)(va)9Section 36(1)9Section 143(1)6Section 143(1)(a)6Section 806Section 139(1)6Section 2503Deduction3Addition to Income

NAGAHAT TEA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, JORHAT

ITA 18/GTY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 119(1)Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 80

10. That appellant reiterates all the grounds of appeal agitated before the Ld. ADDL/JCIT (A) FARIDABAD, NFAC. 11. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or vary from the above grounds of appeal on or before the time of hearing.” 2. Before us, the Ld. AR vehemently argued, with the help of written submissions and detailed paper books, that

3
Natural Justice3
Condonation of Delay3

NAGAHAT TEA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, JORHAT

ITA 19/GTY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Nov 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 119(1)Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 80

10. That appellant reiterates all the grounds of appeal agitated before the Ld. ADDL/JCIT (A) FARIDABAD, NFAC. 11. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or vary from the above grounds of appeal on or before the time of hearing.” 2. Before us, the Ld. AR vehemently argued, with the help of written submissions and detailed paper books, that

NAGAHAT TEA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, JORHAT

ITA 20/GTY/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Nov 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 119(1)Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 80

10. That appellant reiterates all the grounds of appeal agitated before the Ld. ADDL/JCIT (A) FARIDABAD, NFAC. 11. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or vary from the above grounds of appeal on or before the time of hearing.” 2. Before us, the Ld. AR vehemently argued, with the help of written submissions and detailed paper books, that