THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance of claim of deduction for 'Other Provisions'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs.5,61,254/- 4. Now, we shall take above grounds, one by one. Common ground No.1 raised by the assessee is as follows: (1) Disallowance of claim of deduction under section

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI vs. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance of claim of deduction for 'Other Provisions'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs.5,61,254/- 4. Now, we shall take above grounds, one by one. Common ground No.1 raised by the assessee is as follows: (1) Disallowance of claim of deduction under section

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance of claim of deduction for 'Other Provisions'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs.5,61,254/- 4. Now, we shall take above grounds, one by one. Common ground No.1 raised by the assessee is as follows: (1) Disallowance of claim of deduction under section

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance of claim of deduction for 'Other Provisions'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs.5,61,254/- 4. Now, we shall take above grounds, one by one. Common ground No.1 raised by the assessee is as follows: (1) Disallowance of claim of deduction under section

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance of claim of deduction for 'Other Provisions'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs.5,61,254/- 4. Now, we shall take above grounds, one by one. Common ground No.1 raised by the assessee is as follows: (1) Disallowance of claim of deduction under section

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance of claim of deduction for 'Other Provisions'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs.5,61,254/- 4. Now, we shall take above grounds, one by one. Common ground No.1 raised by the assessee is as follows: (1) Disallowance of claim of deduction under section

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance of claim of deduction for 'Other Provisions'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs.5,61,254/- 4. Now, we shall take above grounds, one by one. Common ground No.1 raised by the assessee is as follows: (1) Disallowance of claim of deduction under section

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance of claim of deduction for 'Other Provisions'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs.5,61,254/- 4. Now, we shall take above grounds, one by one. Common ground No.1 raised by the assessee is as follows: (1) Disallowance of claim of deduction under section

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-DIMAPUR, DIMAPUR

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, V.P & Shri S.S. Godara, Am S. A. No.01/Gau/2020 (In Ita No.477/Gau/2019) & M/S Jack N Jill, Dimapur Vs. Acit, Circle-Dimapur, Dimapur Solo Complex, Hazi Park Road, Hongkong Market, Dimapur, Nagaland, Pin-797112. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aalfj0244L (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Sanjay Mody, Ca Respondent By : Shri Jayanta Mridha, Jcit, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 14/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S.S. Godara: This Assessee’S Stay Application S.A No.01/Gau/20 Seeks To Restrain The Department From Effecting Outstanding Demand Of Rs.3,74,133/- Out Of The Total Sum Of Rs.467379/- Arising From Both The Learned Lower Authorities’ Action Disallowing/Adding Rent Payment Of Rs.11,46,312/- For Non-Deduction Of Tds During The Course Of Assessment Framed On 26.11.2018 As Affirmed In The Lower Appellate Order Under Challenge.

section 40(a)(ia) disallowance of rent payment involving sum of Rs.11,46,312/-, we notice that this assessee-firm

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

disallowances. 10. We find no infirmity in the aforesaid act of the learned Tribunal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. "(emphasis supplied) 43. Gainful reference may also be made to the following observations made by the Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs IBC Knowledge Park (P) Ltd. [69 taxmann.com 108], which is as follows: "Materials such as books

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 80IB for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 and benefit u/s. 80IC for the assessments years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are to be allowed.” 5. Learned senior standing counsel seeks us to treat the Revenue’s appeal ITA No.120/Gau/2008 for assessment year 2003-04 as the “lead” case raising the following substantive grounds:- ITA No.120-123/G/2008 & 87/G/10

OIL INDIA LTD.,,DIBRUGARH vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH.

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 80IB for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 and benefit u/s. 80IC for the assessments years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are to be allowed.” 5. Learned senior standing counsel seeks us to treat the Revenue’s appeal ITA No.120/Gau/2008 for assessment year 2003-04 as the “lead” case raising the following substantive grounds:- ITA No.120-123/G/2008 & 87/G/10

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 80IB for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 and benefit u/s. 80IC for the assessments years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are to be allowed.” 5. Learned senior standing counsel seeks us to treat the Revenue’s appeal ITA No.120/Gau/2008 for assessment year 2003-04 as the “lead” case raising the following substantive grounds:- ITA No.120-123/G/2008 & 87/G/10

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 80IB for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 and benefit u/s. 80IC for the assessments years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are to be allowed.” 5. Learned senior standing counsel seeks us to treat the Revenue’s appeal ITA No.120/Gau/2008 for assessment year 2003-04 as the “lead” case raising the following substantive grounds:- ITA No.120-123/G/2008 & 87/G/10

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 80IB for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 and benefit u/s. 80IC for the assessments years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are to be allowed.” 5. Learned senior standing counsel seeks us to treat the Revenue’s appeal ITA No.120/Gau/2008 for assessment year 2003-04 as the “lead” case raising the following substantive grounds:- ITA No.120-123/G/2008 & 87/G/10

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH. vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 80IB for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 and benefit u/s. 80IC for the assessments years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are to be allowed.” 5. Learned senior standing counsel seeks us to treat the Revenue’s appeal ITA No.120/Gau/2008 for assessment year 2003-04 as the “lead” case raising the following substantive grounds:- ITA No.120-123/G/2008 & 87/G/10

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH. vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 80IB for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 and benefit u/s. 80IC for the assessments years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are to be allowed.” 5. Learned senior standing counsel seeks us to treat the Revenue’s appeal ITA No.120/Gau/2008 for assessment year 2003-04 as the “lead” case raising the following substantive grounds:- ITA No.120-123/G/2008 & 87/G/10

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 80IB for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 and benefit u/s. 80IC for the assessments years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are to be allowed.” 5. Learned senior standing counsel seeks us to treat the Revenue’s appeal ITA No.120/Gau/2008 for assessment year 2003-04 as the “lead” case raising the following substantive grounds:- ITA No.120-123/G/2008 & 87/G/10