BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

61 results for “disallowance”+ Section 42clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,107Delhi4,620Bangalore1,511Chennai1,407Kolkata1,156Ahmedabad1,052Hyderabad643Jaipur534Indore401Pune342Surat333Chandigarh323Raipur241Cochin212Rajkot186Amritsar176Nagpur165Cuttack133Karnataka123Visakhapatnam121Agra104Lucknow91Allahabad66Guwahati61Ranchi54Calcutta45SC43Jodhpur41Patna30Telangana29Dehradun28Varanasi21Jabalpur19Panaji15Kerala14Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Rajasthan2Orissa2Uttarakhand1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Addition to Income42Section 80I39Section 25035Section 153C33Disallowance27Section 143(3)21Section 4021Section 6817Depreciation15Deduction

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA vs. M/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 99/GTY/2000[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Dec 2022AY 1993-94

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble]

For Appellant: Smt. Harshita Jain on behalf of NituFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80G

42,000 1989-90 Rs. 74,00,000 1990-91 Rs. 1,83,00,000 1991-92 Rs. 2,00,00,000 1992-93 Rs. 1,45,00,000 The Assessing Officer has held especially that as there is no provision in sections 32AB and 33AB analogous to section 32A (6) and 33A(5) which considers cases of amalgamations

MEGHALAYA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG

Showing 1–20 of 61 · Page 1 of 4

14
Section 143(1)12
Section 40A(3)9

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 361/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head ‘Profits and gains of business or profession’. Since the year under appeal is AY 2016-17 therefore, the said amendment is applicable and therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act needs to be sustained only to the extent

MEGHALAYA ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED, (GPF TRUST),SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 364/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head ‘Profits and gains of business or profession’. Since the year under appeal is AY 2016-17 therefore, the said amendment is applicable and therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act needs to be sustained only to the extent

MEGHALAYA POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 362/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head ‘Profits and gains of business or profession’. Since the year under appeal is AY 2016-17 therefore, the said amendment is applicable and therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act needs to be sustained only to the extent

MEGHALAYA ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 363/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head ‘Profits and gains of business or profession’. Since the year under appeal is AY 2016-17 therefore, the said amendment is applicable and therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act needs to be sustained only to the extent

MEGHALAYA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 360/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head ‘Profits and gains of business or profession’. Since the year under appeal is AY 2016-17 therefore, the said amendment is applicable and therefore, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act needs to be sustained only to the extent

NORTECH POWER PROJECTS (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 316/GTY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 40

section 14A of the Act. 3. For that on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Id. CIT(A) was not justified in confirming disallowance of Rs. 2,42

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 21/GTY/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68

42. The above judgments which were rendered in the context of Section 153A of the Act are mutatis mutandis applicable to Section 153C of the Act as well. Gainful reference may also be made to the decision of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT v. Veerprabhu Marketing Ltd. [2016] 73 taxmann.com 149 (Cal.) as under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY FERTILIZER CORPORATION LIMITED, DIBRUGARH

In the result, both the appeal of revenue as well as Cross Objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 110/GTY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 1Section 37Section 37(1)Section 43B

Section 43B of the Act. 3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)was justified in deleting the disallowance of prior period adjustment when such prior period expenses is not allowable to an assessee following the mercantile system of accounting.” C.O. No. 01/Gau/2022 Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corpn. Ltd., AY 2008-09 3. The issue

ACIT, CIRCLE - TINSUKIA , TINSUKIA vs. M/S. GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD., TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

ITA 359/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 80ISection 92C

disallowance under section 14A of the Act at Rs.31,038/-. Ld. Assessing Officer assessed the income of the assessee at Rs.54,42

GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

ITA 232/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 80ISection 92C

disallowance under section 14A of the Act at Rs.31,038/-. Ld. Assessing Officer assessed the income of the assessee at Rs.54,42

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 110/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 117/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 114/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 116/GTY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 118/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 112/GTY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 150 of the Act and the findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. 10. As regards AY 2017-18 in ITA No. 114/GTY/2024, it was submitted that it was the case of complete scrutiny and the expenses which were not claimed have been disallowed which is not justified. An amount was paid to GMC and though