M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

section 80-1C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2008-09; Rs.351,28,35,732/- Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2009-10; Rs.221,27,40,983/- Ground No.(7) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 Rs.170,67,11,811/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (3). Disallowance

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

section 80-1C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2008-09; Rs.351,28,35,732/- Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2009-10; Rs.221,27,40,983/- Ground No.(7) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 Rs.170,67,11,811/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (3). Disallowance

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

section 80-1C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2008-09; Rs.351,28,35,732/- Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2009-10; Rs.221,27,40,983/- Ground No.(7) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 Rs.170,67,11,811/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (3). Disallowance

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

section 80-1C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2008-09; Rs.351,28,35,732/- Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2009-10; Rs.221,27,40,983/- Ground No.(7) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 Rs.170,67,11,811/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (3). Disallowance

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

section 80-1C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2008-09; Rs.351,28,35,732/- Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2009-10; Rs.221,27,40,983/- Ground No.(7) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 Rs.170,67,11,811/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (3). Disallowance

NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

section 80-1C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2008-09; Rs.351,28,35,732/- Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2009-10; Rs.221,27,40,983/- Ground No.(7) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 Rs.170,67,11,811/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (3). Disallowance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI vs. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

section 80-1C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2008-09; Rs.351,28,35,732/- Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2009-10; Rs.221,27,40,983/- Ground No.(7) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 Rs.170,67,11,811/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (3). Disallowance

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

section 80-1C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2008-09; Rs.351,28,35,732/- Ground No.(4) for the Assessment Year 2009-10; Rs.221,27,40,983/- Ground No.(7) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 Rs.170,67,11,811/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (3). Disallowance

PAWAN COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI ASSAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [ITAT for short hereafter] expired on 17.05.2024. There is therefore a delay of about 211 (two hundred eleven) days or more till date in submitting the appeal before the said learned Tribunal.

disallowances of Rs.5235247, which had been made under section 143(3) read with 1448 in the original Assessment Order dated 27.09.2021 that had been impugned before the learned CIT(A) in the Appeal no.: NFAC/2017- 18/10102742. As the subsequent assessment order under section 147 for the same A.Y. 2018-19 was presumably in supersession of the earlier assessment order under

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

OIL INDIA LTD.,,DIBRUGARH vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH.

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH. vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH. vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

ARUNACHAL POLICE HOUSING & WELFARE CORPORATION LIMITED,PAPUMPARE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-ITANAGAR, ITANAGAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Girish Agrawal, Hon’Ble

disallowing the exemption claimed under section 10(26B). Assessee paid the demand raised thereon of Rs.45,27,145/-. 2.2. Penalty proceedings were subsequently initiated by issuing notice u/s 274