DIVYAMALA PRAKASH,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TEZPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 70/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Nov 2023AY 2016-17
Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2016-17 Divyamala Prakash Ito, Ward-1, Tezpur Flat No. 6A, Syndicate Marble, Six Vs. Mile Radhanagar, Guwahati-784036. Pan: Bpmpp 6934 E (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : None Respondent By : Shri Arun Bhowmick, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 02.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.11.2023 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma, Jm: This Appeal Of The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2016-17 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 14.01.2020 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) -1, Guwahati [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The ‘Ld. Cit(A)’].
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT
Section 131Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A
section 69A of the Act. He also disallowed the setting off loss of Rs. 1,00,572/- against the income from business or profession.
5. Dissatisfied with the above order, assessee went into appeal before the ld. CIT(A) and assessee had made detailed submission along with filing additional evidence in support of her contention. The assessee has filed
