BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 206Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi66Mumbai40Telangana14Ahmedabad14Jaipur12Kolkata9Indore7Chandigarh4Guwahati4Bangalore3Varanasi2Nagpur2Raipur2Chennai2Cochin2Hyderabad2Jodhpur1Rajkot1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)8Section 2018Section 4(1)4Section 2044Section 44Section 133A4Section 1944TDS4Addition to Income4Survey u/s 133A

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 14/GTY/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

disallowing the payments made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act." 6. Per contra, Ld. Sr. DR placed reliance on the order of Ld. AO and asserted that whether income is taxable or not, deduction of tax at source is a mandatory requirement u/s. 194-I which the assessee has failed to do so. According to him, the assessee

4
Natural Justice4

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 15/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

disallowing the payments made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act." 6. Per contra, Ld. Sr. DR placed reliance on the order of Ld. AO and asserted that whether income is taxable or not, deduction of tax at source is a mandatory requirement u/s. 194-I which the assessee has failed to do so. According to him, the assessee

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 16/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

disallowing the payments made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act." 6. Per contra, Ld. Sr. DR placed reliance on the order of Ld. AO and asserted that whether income is taxable or not, deduction of tax at source is a mandatory requirement u/s. 194-I which the assessee has failed to do so. According to him, the assessee

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 17/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

disallowing the payments made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act." 6. Per contra, Ld. Sr. DR placed reliance on the order of Ld. AO and asserted that whether income is taxable or not, deduction of tax at source is a mandatory requirement u/s. 194-I which the assessee has failed to do so. According to him, the assessee