BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “disallowance”+ Section 204clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai791Delhi746Bangalore299Chennai197Kolkata148Ahmedabad98Jaipur69Hyderabad68Chandigarh45Pune39Indore39Calcutta34Ranchi33Lucknow32Raipur27Visakhapatnam19Karnataka16Rajkot16Nagpur15Surat12Telangana12Amritsar11SC9Guwahati8Patna8Cochin8Jodhpur7Cuttack7Punjab & Haryana3Agra2Kerala1Rajasthan1Jabalpur1Dehradun1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)12Section 201(1)8Section 2018Addition to Income8Section 143(3)5Section 4(1)4Section 2044Section 44Section 133A4TDS

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 14/GTY/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

204(iii) of the Act. 4. For that keeping in view the sanctity of the judicial hierarchical system followed in the country, the Id. CIT(A) was not justified in contemptuously ignoring and not following the binding decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court and the Hon'ble Jurisdictional Tribunal cited before him. 5. For that

4
Survey u/s 133A4
Natural Justice4

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 15/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

204(iii) of the Act. 4. For that keeping in view the sanctity of the judicial hierarchical system followed in the country, the Id. CIT(A) was not justified in contemptuously ignoring and not following the binding decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court and the Hon'ble Jurisdictional Tribunal cited before him. 5. For that

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 16/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

204(iii) of the Act. 4. For that keeping in view the sanctity of the judicial hierarchical system followed in the country, the Id. CIT(A) was not justified in contemptuously ignoring and not following the binding decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court and the Hon'ble Jurisdictional Tribunal cited before him. 5. For that

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 17/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

204(iii) of the Act. 4. For that keeping in view the sanctity of the judicial hierarchical system followed in the country, the Id. CIT(A) was not justified in contemptuously ignoring and not following the binding decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court and the Hon'ble Jurisdictional Tribunal cited before him. 5. For that

BAGDEVI SUPPLIERS (P) LTD,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 15/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati30 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 264Section 68

204 of 2022, if there is no tax-free income to the assessee, then no disallowance is to be made under section

VIVEK AGARWAL,TINSUKIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, TINSUKIA

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/GTY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A). Needless to say, the assessee is aggrieved by the action of the Ld. Assessing Officer in all the three matters and has challenged the imposition of penalty in ITA No. 227 & 228/Gty/2024. He has also challenged the treatment of LTCG as bogus in the case of ITA No. 204/Gty/2018. For the A.Y. 2014-15 (ITA No. 204/Gty/2018) the assessee has filed revised grounds of appeal which deserve to be extracted for reference:

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

204 & 228/Gty/2024 pertain to A.Y. 2014-15, whereas, ITA No. 204/Gty/2018 pertains to the quantum and ITA No. 228/Gty/2024 pertains to penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. ITA No. 227/Gty/2024 pertains to A.Y. 2013-14 and is on a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2. In this case, A.Y. 2014-15 concerns

VIVEK AGARWAL,GURGAON vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, TINSUKIA

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 228/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

204 & 228/Gty/2024 pertain to A.Y. 2014-15, whereas, ITA No. 204/Gty/2018 pertains to the quantum and ITA No. 228/Gty/2024 pertains to penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. ITA No. 227/Gty/2024 pertains to A.Y. 2013-14 and is on a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2. In this case, A.Y. 2014-15 concerns

VIVEK AGARWAL,GURGAON vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, TINSUKIA

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 227/GTY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A). Needless to say, the assessee is aggrieved by the action of the Ld. Assessing Officer in all the three matters and has challenged the imposition of penalty in ITA No. 227 & 228/Gty/2024. He has also challenged the treatment of LTCG as bogus in the case of ITA No. 204/Gty/2018. For the A.Y. 2014-15 (ITA No. 204/Gty/2018) the assessee has filed revised grounds of appeal which deserve to be extracted for reference:

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

204 & 228/Gty/2024 pertain to A.Y. 2014-15, whereas, ITA No. 204/Gty/2018 pertains to the quantum and ITA No. 228/Gty/2024 pertains to penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. ITA No. 227/Gty/2024 pertains to A.Y. 2013-14 and is on a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2. In this case, A.Y. 2014-15 concerns