BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 184(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi718Mumbai483Bangalore176Ahmedabad151Jaipur142Kolkata116Hyderabad94Chennai92Chandigarh75Raipur64Indore48Surat35Lucknow28Amritsar27Pune27Visakhapatnam23Nagpur17Cochin15Rajkot15Cuttack12Agra9Patna8Karnataka8Allahabad7Guwahati6SC5Jodhpur3Telangana3Dehradun3Jabalpur3Rajasthan2Panaji2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6Disallowance6Addition to Income6Section 2505Section 44A5Depreciation5

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 37/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

184/- was disallowed and added back to the income of the assessee. We observe that ld. AO has neither brought any evidences on record to show that the transactions on account of expenditures are not genuine nor has provided any proper reason for making such allegation in the assessment order. 11. Ld. AO has also not rejected the books

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 38/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: Heard
ITAT Guwahati
05 Apr 2023
AY 2018-19

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

184/- was disallowed and added back to the income of the assessee. We observe that ld. AO has neither brought any evidences on record to show that the transactions on account of expenditures are not genuine nor has provided any proper reason for making such allegation in the assessment order. 11. Ld. AO has also not rejected the books

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 39/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

184/- was disallowed and added back to the income of the assessee. We observe that ld. AO has neither brought any evidences on record to show that the transactions on account of expenditures are not genuine nor has provided any proper reason for making such allegation in the assessment order. 11. Ld. AO has also not rejected the books

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 43/GTY/2022[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

184/- was disallowed and added back to the income of the assessee. We observe that ld. AO has neither brought any evidences on record to show that the transactions on account of expenditures are not genuine nor has provided any proper reason for making such allegation in the assessment order. 11. Ld. AO has also not rejected the books

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 2/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

184/- was disallowed and added back to the income of the assessee. We observe that ld. AO has neither brought any evidences on record to show that the transactions on account of expenditures are not genuine nor has provided any proper reason for making such allegation in the assessment order. 11. Ld. AO has also not rejected the books

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. SHRI PANNALAL BHANSALI, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 428/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati31 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17

For Respondent: Shri P. S. Thuingaleng, ACIT
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

184/- on account of the following: 3 ITA No.428/GTY/2019 & CO No. 12/GTY/2019 Pannalal Bhansali, AY: 2016-17 a) Addition on account of transfer - Rs.13,42,97,642/- entries in the personal capital account for unsubstantiated increase in capital as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the Act b) Addition on account of Long Term - Rs.2,58,69,249/- Capital Gain