BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “disallowance”+ Section 155clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai929Delhi919Ahmedabad245Chennai243Bangalore238Jaipur166Kolkata139Pune118Hyderabad116Cochin81Surat68Raipur61Chandigarh58Indore54Allahabad50Cuttack47Rajkot44Lucknow42Calcutta37Nagpur21Visakhapatnam14SC14Jodhpur13Karnataka11Guwahati10Amritsar9Jabalpur8Telangana5Varanasi4Agra4Panaji3Dehradun1Punjab & Haryana1Ranchi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 153A15Addition to Income9Disallowance7Section 686Section 143(3)6Section 2504Section 80I4Section 92C4Section 1313Section 115J

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 222/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

disallowed. He has to verify if this provision has been included in the WIP or not. If included then it is to be adjudicated once it has not been allowed as a deduction then it is to be excluded from the WIP also. This expense be carried out after going through the detailed explanation of the assessee and ledger account

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 219/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: Heard
3
Unexplained Cash Credit3
Natural Justice3
ITAT Guwahati
05 Apr 2023
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

disallowed. He has to verify if this provision has been included in the WIP or not. If included then it is to be adjudicated once it has not been allowed as a deduction then it is to be excluded from the WIP also. This expense be carried out after going through the detailed explanation of the assessee and ledger account

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 224/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

disallowed. He has to verify if this provision has been included in the WIP or not. If included then it is to be adjudicated once it has not been allowed as a deduction then it is to be excluded from the WIP also. This expense be carried out after going through the detailed explanation of the assessee and ledger account

GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

ITA 232/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 80ISection 92C

disallowance under section 14A of the Act at Rs.31,038/-. Ld. Assessing Officer assessed the income of the assessee at Rs.54,42,24,737/- and income computed under section 115JB of the Act at Rs.3,23,17,984/- (after giving set off of the MAT credit of Rs.18,49,81,989/-). Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before

ACIT, CIRCLE - TINSUKIA , TINSUKIA vs. M/S. GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD., TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

ITA 359/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 80ISection 92C

disallowance under section 14A of the Act at Rs.31,038/-. Ld. Assessing Officer assessed the income of the assessee at Rs.54,42,24,737/- and income computed under section 115JB of the Act at Rs.3,23,17,984/- (after giving set off of the MAT credit of Rs.18,49,81,989/-). Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before

SHRI SAHIL SURENDRA SAHARIA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 1(3), DIBRUGARH

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 56/GTY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati18 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Sainiassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

section 37(1). It is merely on arrangement to reduce the taxable income by claiming false expenditure. I therefore, disallow the expense amounting to Rs. 70,00,000/- claimed under head Commission/fee for technical services paid for procuring high value policies/assignments and add back to the total income of the assessee" ITA No.56/Gau/2018 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Sahil Surendra

GREENLAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per the terms indicated above

ITA 402/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 25Section 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 31(3)(a)

disallowance of amortization leasehold lands. We thus decline to interfere”. 30. We, therefore under the given facts and circumstances of the case and respectfully following the decisions referred hereinabove, are of the view that the amortization of leasehold land and land development charges of Rs.18,73,242/- deserves to be allowed as an expenditure under section

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. SHRI RATAN SHARMA , GUWAHATI

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed

ITA 72/GTY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 131Section 143(3)

155 & 149 (assessment year-wise); respectively involving proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file(s) perused. 2. We come to Revenue’s appeal first involving various inter-connected identical issue. Its first substantive ground in ITA No.71/Gau/2017 pertaining to assessment year 2009-10 is that

SHRI RATAN SHARMA ,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed

ITA 98/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 131Section 143(3)

155 & 149 (assessment year-wise); respectively involving proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file(s) perused. 2. We come to Revenue’s appeal first involving various inter-connected identical issue. Its first substantive ground in ITA No.71/Gau/2017 pertaining to assessment year 2009-10 is that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. SHRI RATAN SHARMA , GUWAHATI

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed

ITA 71/GTY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 131Section 143(3)

155 & 149 (assessment year-wise); respectively involving proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file(s) perused. 2. We come to Revenue’s appeal first involving various inter-connected identical issue. Its first substantive ground in ITA No.71/Gau/2017 pertaining to assessment year 2009-10 is that