BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 145(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,839Delhi1,468Kolkata485Chennai431Bangalore406Jaipur331Ahmedabad245Hyderabad172Surat164Chandigarh124Agra106Pune97Raipur92Indore81Cochin78Rajkot75Lucknow65Visakhapatnam52Amritsar51Allahabad39Calcutta39Ranchi37Nagpur32Karnataka32Telangana27Cuttack24Jodhpur22Patna19SC18Dehradun13Varanasi10Panaji7Guwahati6Punjab & Haryana4Jabalpur4Himachal Pradesh3Rajasthan1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 1478Section 69C7Section 271(1)(c)6Addition to Income6Section 143(3)5Section 104Section 1483Section 2502Section 702Reassessment

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

1 crore. 36 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 & Assessment Year: 2013-2014 ABCI Infrastructure Pvt. Limited However, on-going through the judgments of the Commissioner of Income-tax, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court, we find that on the merits a disallowance of Rs.19,39,60,866 was based solely on third party information, which was not subjected

2
Search & Seizure2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

1 crore. 36 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 & Assessment Year: 2013-2014 ABCI Infrastructure Pvt. Limited However, on-going through the judgments of the Commissioner of Income-tax, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court, we find that on the merits a disallowance of Rs.19,39,60,866 was based solely on third party information, which was not subjected

ARUNACHAL POLICE HOUSING & WELFARE CORPORATION LIMITED,PAPUMPARE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-ITANAGAR, ITANAGAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 117/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Girish Agrawal, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT, D/R
Section 10Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

disallowing the exemption claimed under section 10(26B). Assessee paid the demand raised thereon of Rs.45,27,145/-. 2.2. Penalty proceedings were subsequently initiated by issuing notice u/s 274 rws 271(1

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA 32/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133(6)Section 250Section 69CSection 70

1. On facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in law in upholding the assessment proceedings ignoring the fact that impugned assessment is invalid and without jurisdiction as the said assessment is completed without complying with legal requirements of the provisions of section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act therefore such assessment is void

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAS OFFICER

ITA 33/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133(6)Section 250Section 69CSection 70

1. On facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in law in upholding the assessment proceedings ignoring the fact that impugned assessment is invalid and without jurisdiction as the said assessment is completed without complying with legal requirements of the provisions of section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act therefore such assessment is void

NISHA RANI,C/O SAHAY ENTERPRISES vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1(2), AAYAKAR BHAWAN,

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 434/GTY/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Mar 2026AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri Rajesh Kumarnisha Rani, I.T.O., Bedi Market, At Road, Ward-1(2), Vs. Guwahati-781001 (Assam) Guwahati. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Afjpr 7852 P Assessee By : Shri Vishesh Surana, Fca. Revenue By : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing: 09/03/2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 13/03/2026 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Vishesh Surana, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl
Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69C

disallowed specially when the corresponding sales were not doubted and books of account were not rejected under Section 145(3) of the Act. At the most, the addition can be made by applying a certain percentage on estimated basis in order to assess the extra profit which is earned by the assessee by making purchases from the grey market while