DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY 2011-

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 142(3) of the Act. A perusal of the order sheet, a copy of which has been filed by the appellant, show that there is no order sheet entry regarding issue notices u/s. 133(6) of the Act to the company share holders as mentioned by the Assessing Officer. It further shows that no enquiries were made

M/S. CHARU RNGINEERING INDUSTRIES & M/S. CHARU INNOVATION DEPARTMENT & INDUSTRIES,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Shri Lakshmi Ram Thakuria Ito, Ward-3(2), Guwahati On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Engineering Industries, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P M/S Charu Engineering The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-3, Industries Guwahati M/S Charu Innovation 7Th Aaykarbhawan, Floor, Department Industries, On Vs. G.S. Road, Guwahati- Behalf Of Prop. Shri Lakshmi 781005 Ram Thakuria, Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Narengi, Guwahati-26 .. (Appellant) ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P The Dy. Commissioner O Income Tax Officer, On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Circle-3, Guwahati, Engineering Industries, Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother G.S. Road, Guwahti-781005 Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 .. (Appellant) (Respondent)

6) of section 80-IE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80-IE of the Act amounting to Rs.87,60,893/- for its proprietary concern, namely, M/s Charu Innovation & Industries was disallowed. 7.Aggrieved, by the order of AO, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT(A), who has confirmed

SHRI LAKSHMI RAM THAKURIA,GUWAHATI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Shri Lakshmi Ram Thakuria Ito, Ward-3(2), Guwahati On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Engineering Industries, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P M/S Charu Engineering The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-3, Industries Guwahati M/S Charu Innovation 7Th Aaykarbhawan, Floor, Department Industries, On Vs. G.S. Road, Guwahati- Behalf Of Prop. Shri Lakshmi 781005 Ram Thakuria, Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Narengi, Guwahati-26 .. (Appellant) ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P The Dy. Commissioner O Income Tax Officer, On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Circle-3, Guwahati, Engineering Industries, Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother G.S. Road, Guwahti-781005 Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 .. (Appellant) (Respondent)

6) of section 80-IE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80-IE of the Act amounting to Rs.87,60,893/- for its proprietary concern, namely, M/s Charu Innovation & Industries was disallowed. 7.Aggrieved, by the order of AO, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT(A), who has confirmed

SHRI LAKSHMI RAM THAKURIA,GUWAHATI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Shri Lakshmi Ram Thakuria Ito, Ward-3(2), Guwahati On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Engineering Industries, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P M/S Charu Engineering The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-3, Industries Guwahati M/S Charu Innovation 7Th Aaykarbhawan, Floor, Department Industries, On Vs. G.S. Road, Guwahati- Behalf Of Prop. Shri Lakshmi 781005 Ram Thakuria, Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Narengi, Guwahati-26 .. (Appellant) ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P The Dy. Commissioner O Income Tax Officer, On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Circle-3, Guwahati, Engineering Industries, Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother G.S. Road, Guwahti-781005 Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 .. (Appellant) (Respondent)

6) of section 80-IE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80-IE of the Act amounting to Rs.87,60,893/- for its proprietary concern, namely, M/s Charu Innovation & Industries was disallowed. 7.Aggrieved, by the order of AO, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT(A), who has confirmed

SHRI LAKSHMI RAM THAKURIA,GUWAHATI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Shri Lakshmi Ram Thakuria Ito, Ward-3(2), Guwahati On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Engineering Industries, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P M/S Charu Engineering The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-3, Industries Guwahati M/S Charu Innovation 7Th Aaykarbhawan, Floor, Department Industries, On Vs. G.S. Road, Guwahati- Behalf Of Prop. Shri Lakshmi 781005 Ram Thakuria, Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Narengi, Guwahati-26 .. (Appellant) ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P The Dy. Commissioner O Income Tax Officer, On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Circle-3, Guwahati, Engineering Industries, Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother G.S. Road, Guwahti-781005 Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 .. (Appellant) (Respondent)

6) of section 80-IE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80-IE of the Act amounting to Rs.87,60,893/- for its proprietary concern, namely, M/s Charu Innovation & Industries was disallowed. 7.Aggrieved, by the order of AO, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT(A), who has confirmed

SHRI LAKSHMI RAM THAKURIA,GUWAHATI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Shri Lakshmi Ram Thakuria Ito, Ward-3(2), Guwahati On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Engineering Industries, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P M/S Charu Engineering The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-3, Industries Guwahati M/S Charu Innovation 7Th Aaykarbhawan, Floor, Department Industries, On Vs. G.S. Road, Guwahati- Behalf Of Prop. Shri Lakshmi 781005 Ram Thakuria, Thakurias Novelty, Mother Teresa Road, Narengi, Guwahati-26 .. (Appellant) ( Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No. Acbpt9469P The Dy. Commissioner O Income Tax Officer, On Behalf Of Prop. M/S Charu Circle-3, Guwahati, Engineering Industries, Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, Vs. Thakurias Novelty, Mother G.S. Road, Guwahti-781005 Teresa Road, Nrengi,Guwahati-26 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Lakshmiramthakuria The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Guwahati, Prop-Charu Engineering Aayakar Bhawan, Industries Thakuria Novelties, Vs. Christianbasti, Forest Gate, Guwahati, Pin- Pin-781005 (Assam) 781026 .. (Appellant) (Respondent)

6) of section 80-IE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80-IE of the Act amounting to Rs.87,60,893/- for its proprietary concern, namely, M/s Charu Innovation & Industries was disallowed. 7.Aggrieved, by the order of AO, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT(A), who has confirmed

MANOJ ANAND,GUWAHATI vs. ITO W-2(2) GHY, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm Manoj Anand Ito W-2(2), Ghy Flat 4D, Garima Grand, Aaykar Bhawan, Christian Basti, Departmental Representative B. G.S. Road, Guwahati-781005, Vs. Baruah Road, Guwahati-781007, Assam Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agbpa9883C

133(6) of the Act, thereby affirming the transactions with the assessee. The ld. AR submitted that the assessee has discharged its onus cast upon him by filing all the documents and even sought cross-examination of the parties who has made adverse statements, however the same was not allowed. The ld. AR stated that at the time of proceeding

PLASCOM INDUSTRIES LLP,KOLKATA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU (Accountant Member)

section 801E(6) r.w.s. 801A(8) of the IT Act d) During the course of assessment proceedings, notice u/s 133(6) was issued to few parties. It is noted that the following party has not responded to the notice. In view of the non-compliance, the transactions with the following parties remain unsubstantiated. SI. Name Y/N No. 1 SHIV POLYMERS

RI-BHOI ISPAT & ROLLING MILLS,BYRNIHAT vs. ITO, WARD- BYRNIHAT, BYRNIHAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

133(6) and was not found during physical verification. So, it is clear that both the parties are mere paper entity and has not done any real business. These entities have been used to provide accommodation entries. (ix) Recent Decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court In this connection, reliance is placed on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court given

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. DHAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is partly allowed

Bench: Sri Manomohan Das & Sri Rakesh Mishra

133(6) were issued to a sample of individuals to verify the genuineness of expenses. Some individuals responded with the required details, while others did not. Payments made to certain individuals were considered bogus, and the AO added back these amounts to the income under section 69C of the Income Tax Act. Section 69C allows the deemed income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 4, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. A. T. C. REALTORS PVT. LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 169/Gau/2018 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2012-13) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 170/Gau/2018 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2013-14) Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, M/S Atc Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Circle-4, Aayakar Bhwawan, 5Th C/O. Atc Assam Ltd, Kedar Vs. Floor, Christanbasti, G.S. Road, Road, Machkhowa, Guwahati-781005 Guwahati-781001 (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. Aagca5209A

133(6) of the Act calling for information from her as well as summon issued under Section 131 were well served upon her at her residential address at D/o Late Sh. F.G. Franklin, Mission Compound Road, Mawkhar, Shillong-02. Even the Ld. AO had not disputed the identify of Mrs. Davina Mary Lyngwa. Further, Mrs. Davina Mary Lyngwa had duly

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 4, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. A. T. C. REALTORS PVT. LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 169/Gau/2018 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2012-13) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 170/Gau/2018 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2013-14) Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, M/S Atc Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Circle-4, Aayakar Bhwawan, 5Th C/O. Atc Assam Ltd, Kedar Vs. Floor, Christanbasti, G.S. Road, Road, Machkhowa, Guwahati-781005 Guwahati-781001 (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. Aagca5209A

133(6) of the Act calling for information from her as well as summon issued under Section 131 were well served upon her at her residential address at D/o Late Sh. F.G. Franklin, Mission Compound Road, Mawkhar, Shillong-02. Even the Ld. AO had not disputed the identify of Mrs. Davina Mary Lyngwa. Further, Mrs. Davina Mary Lyngwa had duly

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

133(6) were ever issued. There was therefore no cause for levelling this allegation at the assessee. You Honours, all these wrong facts have heavily weighed upon the judgement of the Hon'ble CIT(A) and hence the CIT(A) was wrong in rejecting the appeal. Reference Invited: 1. Order Sheet of Proceedings u/s 143(3). 2. List of Existing

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

133(6) of the Act alongwith detailed documentary evidences in support thereof. They also offered to appear personally before the Ld. A.O for confirmation of the impugned transactions. However, for reasons best known to the Ld. A.O, the said persons were never summoned by the Ld. A.O. 3.11 The Ld. A.O. has also commented on the alleged abnormal price movement

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

133(6) of the Act alongwith detailed documentary evidences in support thereof. They also offered to appear personally before the Ld. A.O for confirmation of the impugned transactions. However, for reasons best known to the Ld. A.O, the said persons were never summoned by the Ld. A.O. 3.11 The Ld. A.O. has also commented on the alleged abnormal price movement

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

133(6) of the Act alongwith detailed documentary evidences in support thereof. They also offered to appear personally before the Ld. A.O for confirmation of the impugned transactions. However, for reasons best known to the Ld. A.O, the said persons were never summoned by the Ld. A.O. 3.11 The Ld. A.O. has also commented on the alleged abnormal price movement

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

133(6) of the Act alongwith detailed documentary evidences in support thereof. They also offered to appear personally before the Ld. A.O for confirmation of the impugned transactions. However, for reasons best known to the Ld. A.O, the said persons were never summoned by the Ld. A.O. 3.11 The Ld. A.O. has also commented on the alleged abnormal price movement

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

133(6) of the Act alongwith detailed documentary evidences in support thereof. They also offered to appear personally before the Ld. A.O for confirmation of the impugned transactions. However, for reasons best known to the Ld. A.O, the said persons were never summoned by the Ld. A.O. 3.11 The Ld. A.O. has also commented on the alleged abnormal price movement