M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI vs. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground

M/S. G.D. MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUWAHATI`

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg

13,52,49,494/-. ” 4. The Ld. Counsel first of all brought to our notice that the aforesaid legal issue that has been raised is no longer res integra and has been adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal Bangalore Bench in the case of IT(TP)A No. 1722/Bang/2017 in Texport Overseas Private Limited Vs. DCIT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA vs. M/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble]

D. Sen. The Assessing Officer was of the view that these expenses were not incurred for the purpose of business. However, the ld. CIT(A) has deleted both the disallowances. The ld. CIT(A) was of the view that the Board of Directors had approved that the expenses incurred on foreign tours of the wife of the Managing Directors would

ASSAM ROOFING LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), GUWAHATI

Appeal is allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2014-15

13 mentioned in clause (ii) of sub-section (2) of Section 80-IC, would be entitled to deduction at the rate of 100% of the profits and gains for five assessment years commencing with the ‘initial assessment year’. For the next five years, the admissible deduction would be 25% (or 30% where the assessee is a company) of the profits

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH. vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH. vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB

OIL INDIA LTD.,,DIBRUGARH vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH.

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

disallowed such claim under Section 80IB and also under Section 80IC for the respective years on, inter alia, the following grounds:- A) The assessee’s oil wells for which the claim is made, is not an new industrial undertaking or enterprise; though there is no dispute that these are plants. B) As per Sub Rule (2) of Rule 18BBB