PLASCOM INDUSTRIES LLP,KOLKATA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 280/GTY/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Mar 2026AY 2023-24
Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: S.M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sanjay Jha, JCIT
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 250Section 801ESection 801E(3)Section 801E(4)Section 801E(5)Section 801E(6)Section 80I
133(6), the transaction in respect of the following parties are not matching with the details filed by you.
SI.
Name
Y/N
No.
1
ANUP GARG & OTHERS reco
(HUF)
2
ASSAM
INDUSTRIAL reco
INFRASTRCTURE
DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
3
BDG SHANTI POLYPACK reco
PRIVATE LIMITED
A copy of the ledger account submitted by these parties are enclosed. You are, therefore, requested