DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

10,612/- 3. JCB: Rs. 1,40,47,786/- 4. Total Rs. 6,19,58,397/- 33. Complete details of the block of assets, written down value and depreciation claimed on the aforesaid vehicles were placed before ld. AO and the same are placed at pages 740 to 753 of the paperbook filed before us. Ld. AO on an analysis

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

10,612/- 3. JCB: Rs. 1,40,47,786/- 4. Total Rs. 6,19,58,397/- 33. Complete details of the block of assets, written down value and depreciation claimed on the aforesaid vehicles were placed before ld. AO and the same are placed at pages 740 to 753 of the paperbook filed before us. Ld. AO on an analysis

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

10,612/- 3. JCB: Rs. 1,40,47,786/- 4. Total Rs. 6,19,58,397/- 33. Complete details of the block of assets, written down value and depreciation claimed on the aforesaid vehicles were placed before ld. AO and the same are placed at pages 740 to 753 of the paperbook filed before us. Ld. AO on an analysis

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

10,612/- 3. JCB: Rs. 1,40,47,786/- 4. Total Rs. 6,19,58,397/- 33. Complete details of the block of assets, written down value and depreciation claimed on the aforesaid vehicles were placed before ld. AO and the same are placed at pages 740 to 753 of the paperbook filed before us. Ld. AO on an analysis

M/S. ASSAM CARBON PRODUCTS LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, the revenue’s appeal for the AY 2014-15 is dismissed and that of assessee’s appeal for the AY 2012-13 is allowed

26. Shri Parag Tripathi, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Department, submitted that in Section 43A (as it stood prior to Finance Act, 2002) the expression ''for making payment” is in the context of increase or decrease of liability and the same hinges on “making payment towards the whole or a part of ... ". According to the learned

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), GUWAHATI vs. M/S.ASSAM CARBON PRODUCTS LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, the revenue’s appeal for the AY 2014-15 is dismissed and that of assessee’s appeal for the AY 2012-13 is allowed

26. Shri Parag Tripathi, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Department, submitted that in Section 43A (as it stood prior to Finance Act, 2002) the expression ''for making payment” is in the context of increase or decrease of liability and the same hinges on “making payment towards the whole or a part of ... ". According to the learned

GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Manish Borad

10-06-2003, will be treated as capital receipt and not liable to tax. In this regard, statement showing computation of excise duty exemption received during the year aggregating to Rs. 87,98,09,432/- alongwith copy of Excise Returns (in case of Rudrapur Unit 1) and copy of Form A (in case of Rudrapur Unit 2) has been enclosed

ACIT, CIRCLE - TINSUKIA , TINSUKIA vs. M/S. GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD., TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Manish Borad

10-06-2003, will be treated as capital receipt and not liable to tax. In this regard, statement showing computation of excise duty exemption received during the year aggregating to Rs. 87,98,09,432/- alongwith copy of Excise Returns (in case of Rudrapur Unit 1) and copy of Form A (in case of Rudrapur Unit 2) has been enclosed

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

10% on Rs.17,49,055 is disallowed. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for under reporting income/ misreporting income is being initiated separately. [(i) Depreciation disallowed Rs.1,74,905/- & (ii) Addition Rs.17,49,055/-] 3.2 On verification of audited Audit accounts, it is seen that the assessee debited Rs.41,000/- as sundry subscription. In response

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. WINNER DEALTRADE (P) LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections 148 to 153 referred to as the relevant assessment year)." 6. On going through the changes, quoted above, made to Section 147 of the Act, we find that, prior to Direct Tax Laws (Amendment