BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “depreciation”+ House Propertyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,464Delhi1,016Bangalore417Chennai327Ahmedabad259Kolkata232Jaipur144Chandigarh107Pune101Hyderabad98Cochin84Karnataka83Raipur50Indore46Visakhapatnam39Amritsar33Cuttack30Lucknow30Surat20Nagpur18Telangana16Rajkot15SC14Guwahati12Jodhpur12Agra8Panaji6Kerala6Patna5Allahabad3Ranchi2Calcutta2Varanasi2Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1Rajasthan1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Addition to Income12Section 6811Section 143(3)9Depreciation8Disallowance7Section 2506Section 44A5Section 404Section 104Deduction

M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. ,DIBRUGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 200/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

property, its guest house, charges for equipment and recoveries from the contractors on account of water and electricity supply. These items are covered by the decision in Bokaro Steel ltd.’s case (1999) 236 ITR 315 (SC). To the extent that it relates to these items, i.e., items excluding interest, the question must be answered in the affirmative

M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. ,DIBRUGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 94/GTY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Oct 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

4
Unexplained Cash Credit2
Exemption2

property, its guest house, charges for equipment and recoveries from the contractors on account of water and electricity supply. These items are covered by the decision in Bokaro Steel ltd.’s case (1999) 236 ITR 315 (SC). To the extent that it relates to these items, i.e., items excluding interest, the question must be answered in the affirmative

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, DIBRUGARH vs. M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER & POLYMER LTD. , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 89/GTY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Oct 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

property, its guest house, charges for equipment and recoveries from the contractors on account of water and electricity supply. These items are covered by the decision in Bokaro Steel ltd.’s case (1999) 236 ITR 315 (SC). To the extent that it relates to these items, i.e., items excluding interest, the question must be answered in the affirmative

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA vs. M/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 99/GTY/2000[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Dec 2022AY 1993-94

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble]

For Appellant: Smt. Harshita Jain on behalf of NituFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80G

depreciation on guest house cannot be brought under the purview of section 37(4) as there are specific provisions for allowance of the same. The said items of expenditure are not governed by the provisions of section 37(1) which is pre-condition for applying section 37(4). Therefore, respectfully following the decisions cited above, it delete the disallowance

SIKSHA NIKETAN H.S. SCHOOL,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 19/GTY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 40Section 68

depreciation claim(s) on the ground that there was no evidence tendered during the course of assessment establishing its status either as an owner or lessee qua asset in question. 3. We have given our thoughtful consideration to rival contentions. This tribunal’s earlier order appears to have restored assessee’s first round lis back to CIT(A) with

SIKSHA NIKETAN H.S. SCHOOL,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 14/GTY/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Jul 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 40Section 68

depreciation claim(s) on the ground that there was no evidence tendered during the course of assessment establishing its status either as an owner or lessee qua asset in question. 3. We have given our thoughtful consideration to rival contentions. This tribunal’s earlier order appears to have restored assessee’s first round lis back to CIT(A) with

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 2/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation of Rs. 3,23,72,494/-. Accordingly, Ground No. 3 raised by the Revenue is dismissed. 44. Ground no. 4 raised by the Revenue is on account of disallowance of Rs. 3,05,471/- u/s 14A of the Act r.w.r 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted Page 40 of 114 I.T.A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 38/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation of Rs. 3,23,72,494/-. Accordingly, Ground No. 3 raised by the Revenue is dismissed. 44. Ground no. 4 raised by the Revenue is on account of disallowance of Rs. 3,05,471/- u/s 14A of the Act r.w.r 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted Page 40 of 114 I.T.A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 37/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation of Rs. 3,23,72,494/-. Accordingly, Ground No. 3 raised by the Revenue is dismissed. 44. Ground no. 4 raised by the Revenue is on account of disallowance of Rs. 3,05,471/- u/s 14A of the Act r.w.r 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted Page 40 of 114 I.T.A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 39/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation of Rs. 3,23,72,494/-. Accordingly, Ground No. 3 raised by the Revenue is dismissed. 44. Ground no. 4 raised by the Revenue is on account of disallowance of Rs. 3,05,471/- u/s 14A of the Act r.w.r 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted Page 40 of 114 I.T.A

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 43/GTY/2022[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation of Rs. 3,23,72,494/-. Accordingly, Ground No. 3 raised by the Revenue is dismissed. 44. Ground no. 4 raised by the Revenue is on account of disallowance of Rs. 3,05,471/- u/s 14A of the Act r.w.r 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted Page 40 of 114 I.T.A

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3), GUWAHATI vs. PRAG RAJ SINGLA, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 160/GTY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Gau/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri Sandip Sengupta, JCIT DRFor Respondent: Shri B. L. Purohit FCA & Shri Subash Purohit, FCA
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

House No. 31, Shiva Niwas, 1stByelane, Ajanta Path, Survey, Beltala, Guwahati-781028. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AOGPS 3670 G (Assessee) .. (Revenue) Assesseeby : Shri Sandip Sengupta, JCIT DR Respondent by : Shri B. L. Purohit FCA & Shri Subash Purohit, FCA सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 15/05/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 02/08/2019 आदेश