Search: depreciation | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

41 results for “depreciation”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,499 Delhi1,932 Chennai1,018 Bangalore877 Ahmedabad601 Kolkata504 Jaipur269 Pune254 Hyderabad208 Chandigarh190 Karnataka155 Raipur128 Cochin114 Visakhapatnam99 Indore81 Lucknow72 Surat65 Cuttack60 Amritsar48 Guwahati41 Rajkot40 SC35 Telangana25 Jodhpur24 Nagpur23 Ranchi19 Calcutta10 Panaji9 Agra8 Patna7 Varanasi7 Kerala6 Allahabad5 Rajasthan5 Orissa3 Dehradun3 Gauhati2 Jabalpur2 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 Punjab & Haryana1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)34 Disallowance29 Section 8028 Addition to Income24 Section 80I23 Section 801E19 Deduction16 Section 25012 Exemption12 Section 801E(5)

DEEPA JHUNJHUNWALA,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 127/GTY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A) and thereafter aggrieved the assessee has approached the ITAT with the following grounds:

Section 139(4)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

exemption provision which cannot be compared with claiming an additional depreciation under section 32(1) (ii-a) of the Act. As per the settled

Showing 1–20 of 41 · Page 1 of 3

11

Section 143(1)10

DEEPA JHUNJHUNWALA,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 126/GTY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A) and thereafter aggrieved the assessee has approached the ITAT with the following grounds:

Section 139(4)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

exemption provision which cannot be compared with claiming an additional depreciation under section 32(1) (ii-a) of the Act. As per the settled

SIKSHA NIKETAN H.S. SCHOOL,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 14/GTY/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Jul 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 40Section 68

depreciation claim(s) on the ground that there was no evidence tendered during the course of assessment establishing its status either as an owner or lessee qua asset in question. 3. We have given our thoughtful consideration to rival contentions. This tribunal’s earlier order appears to have restored assessee’s first round lis back to CIT(A) with

SIKSHA NIKETAN H.S. SCHOOL,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 19/GTY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 40Section 68

depreciation claim(s) on the ground that there was no evidence tendered during the course of assessment establishing its status either as an owner or lessee qua asset in question. 3. We have given our thoughtful consideration to rival contentions. This tribunal’s earlier order appears to have restored assessee’s first round lis back to CIT(A) with

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 43/GTY/2022[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation amounting to Rs. 3,23,72,494/- Deduction amounting to Rs. 78,01,892/- Disallowance u/s 14A Rs. 3,05,471/- 7. Being aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are now in appeal before the Tribunal. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the detailed written submission and placed reliance on judgment’s mentioned therein and also stated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 39/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation amounting to Rs. 3,23,72,494/- Deduction amounting to Rs. 78,01,892/- Disallowance u/s 14A Rs. 3,05,471/- 7. Being aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are now in appeal before the Tribunal. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the detailed written submission and placed reliance on judgment’s mentioned therein and also stated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 37/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation amounting to Rs. 3,23,72,494/- Deduction amounting to Rs. 78,01,892/- Disallowance u/s 14A Rs. 3,05,471/- 7. Being aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are now in appeal before the Tribunal. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the detailed written submission and placed reliance on judgment’s mentioned therein and also stated

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 2/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation amounting to Rs. 3,23,72,494/- Deduction amounting to Rs. 78,01,892/- Disallowance u/s 14A Rs. 3,05,471/- 7. Being aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are now in appeal before the Tribunal. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the detailed written submission and placed reliance on judgment’s mentioned therein and also stated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 38/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

depreciation amounting to Rs. 3,23,72,494/- Deduction amounting to Rs. 78,01,892/- Disallowance u/s 14A Rs. 3,05,471/- 7. Being aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are now in appeal before the Tribunal. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the detailed written submission and placed reliance on judgment’s mentioned therein and also stated

GREENLAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per the terms indicated above

ITA 402/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 25Section 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 31(3)(a)

exemption availed during the year is a revenue receipt or capital receipt and whether it is to be included in computing book profits u/s 115JB of the Act. From perusal of the judicial pronouncements referred above, we are of the view that this additional ground raised by the assessee can be entertained before this Tribunal for the first time

PLASCOM INDUSTRIES LLP,KOLKATA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 280/GTY/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Mar 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: S.M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sanjay Jha, JCIT

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 250Section 801ESection 801E(3)Section 801E(4)Section 801E(5)Section 801E(6)Section 80I

exemption u/s 801E on the following grounds. - Vide 1 para page 9 of the assessment order the only ground for disallowance was that the assessee failed to prove that it fulfilled the conditions laid down u/s 80IE (3) 801E (4) and 801E (5) of the Income tax Act 1961. The assessee disputed the action of the Ld. AO before

MONJIL ALI BARBHUIYA,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 28/GTY/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2016-17 Monjil Ali Barbhuiya Ito, Ward-2, Silchar Mazumder Barzar, Tarapur, Vs. Silchar, Cachar-788003. Pan: Anzpb 6357 P (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : None Respondent By : Shri N.T. Sherpa, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 28.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.07.2023 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma, Jm: This Appeal Of The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2016-17 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 08.08.2019 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Appeals, Shillong [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Ld. Cit(A)’]. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “I. For That Under The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Assessment Is Bad In Law & Facts As Your Humble Appellant Could Not Get The Opportunities For Unavoidable Reasons To Rebut The Materials Gathered Against The Assessee & Also Considering Other Facts & Circumstances.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT

Section 131Section 143(2)

depreciation in his return of income and further the ld. AO make an addition of Rs. 43,00,000/- in the hands of assessee which was credited in the bank account of the assessee for which no proper explanation was given by him during the framing of assessment by the AO. The ld. AO while framing the assessment he stated

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 90/GTY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR

Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(3) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs. 17,46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 97/GTY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR

Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(3) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs. 17,46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 8/GTY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR

Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(3) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs. 17,46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 98/GTY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR

Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(3) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs. 17,46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 5/GTY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR

Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(3) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs. 17,46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 7/GTY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR

Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(3) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs. 17,46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance

NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 27/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR

Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(3) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs. 17,46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI vs. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 28/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR

Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground No.(3) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; Rs. 17,46,80,387/- (12). Disallowance