BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 86clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai425Mumbai346Kolkata272Delhi257Ahmedabad168Bangalore162Karnataka126Jaipur112Hyderabad103Pune88Chandigarh71Nagpur70Indore46Cuttack41Calcutta37Surat37Cochin31Visakhapatnam30Lucknow24Kerala17Rajkot16Jodhpur14Patna10SC10Amritsar9Guwahati9Raipur8Panaji8Allahabad4Telangana3Himachal Pradesh2Varanasi2Agra1Jabalpur1Orissa1Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1Ranchi1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 25011Section 44A5Section 143(3)5Depreciation5Disallowance5Addition to Income5Condonation of Delay4

JIBAN DAS,HAILAKANDI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 216/GTY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: This Hon'Ble Tribunal Is Being Filed With A Delay Of 86 Days, The Statutory Period For Filing The Appeal Before The Hon'Ble Tribunal Is

Section 250

86 days, the statutory period for filing the appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal is I.T.A. Nos. 215 & 216/GTY/2025 Jiban Das 60 days from the date of receiving the order was expired on 29th April 2025. 3. That the delay in filing the present appeal is neither deliberate nor intentional but due to bonafide reasons and circumstances beyond the control

JAGANNATH DAS,ALGAPUR BAZAR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 , GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/GTY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: this Hon'ble Tribunal is being filed with a delay of 86 days, the statutory period for filing the appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal is 60 days from the date of receiving the order was expired on 29th April 2025.

Section 250

86 days, the statutory period for filing the appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal is 60 days from the date of receiving the order was expired on 29th April 2025. I.T.A. Nos. 213 & 214/GTY/2025 Jagannath Das 3. That the delay in filing the present appeal is neither deliberate nor intentional but due to bonafide reasons and circumstances beyond the control

JAGANNATH DAS,ALGAPUR BAZAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 214/GTY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: this Hon'ble Tribunal is being filed with a delay of 86 days, the statutory period for filing the appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal is 60 days from the date of receiving the order was expired on 29th April 2025.

Section 250

86 days, the statutory period for filing the appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal is 60 days from the date of receiving the order was expired on 29th April 2025. I.T.A. Nos. 213 & 214/GTY/2025 Jagannath Das 3. That the delay in filing the present appeal is neither deliberate nor intentional but due to bonafide reasons and circumstances beyond the control

JIBAN DAS,HAILAKANDI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 , GUWAHATI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 215/GTY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: This Hon'Ble Tribunal Is Being Filed With A Delay Of 86 Days, The Statutory Period For Filing The Appeal Before The Hon'Ble Tribunal Is

Section 250

86 days, the statutory period for filing the appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal is I.T.A. Nos. 215 & 216/GTY/2025 Jiban Das 60 days from the date of receiving the order was expired on 29th April 2025. 3. That the delay in filing the present appeal is neither deliberate nor intentional but due to bonafide reasons and circumstances beyond the control

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 37/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

condone the impugned delay attributable to various procedural formalities and compilation of records. The case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. The Revenue's first substantive grievance reads that the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting depreciation disallowance of ₹84,86,809/- made by the Assessing Officer in assessment order dated

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 2/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

condone the impugned delay attributable to various procedural formalities and compilation of records. The case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. The Revenue's first substantive grievance reads that the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting depreciation disallowance of ₹84,86,809/- made by the Assessing Officer in assessment order dated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 38/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

condone the impugned delay attributable to various procedural formalities and compilation of records. The case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. The Revenue's first substantive grievance reads that the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting depreciation disallowance of ₹84,86,809/- made by the Assessing Officer in assessment order dated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 39/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

condone the impugned delay attributable to various procedural formalities and compilation of records. The case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. The Revenue's first substantive grievance reads that the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting depreciation disallowance of ₹84,86,809/- made by the Assessing Officer in assessment order dated

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year

ITA 43/GTY/2022[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 44A

condone the impugned delay attributable to various procedural formalities and compilation of records. The case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. The Revenue's first substantive grievance reads that the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting depreciation disallowance of ₹84,86,809/- made by the Assessing Officer in assessment order dated