Search: condonation of delay

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune28 Karnataka21 Jaipur21 Mumbai18 Kolkata17 Delhi17 Chennai13 Ahmedabad12 Bangalore12 Visakhapatnam7 Hyderabad7 Rajkot6 Cochin6 Nagpur5 Amritsar4 Agra3 Surat3 Indore3 Raipur2 Guwahati1 SC1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 271D5 Section 10(26)5 Section 269S3

KENNETH BLAH,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 135/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.135/Gty/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Gupta, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Kaushik Roy, JCIT

Section 10(26)Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 25Section 250Section 269SSection 271D

section 271D is not applicable. 5. In appeal, the ld.CIT(A) confirmed the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s.271D of the Act by holding as under : “5. Findings: The appeal is delayed. In Forms 35, the appellant has submitted as follows: "Not knowing that an appeal had to be filed online." The delay is condoned