Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2506 Section 2546 Section 11(2)5 Section 2634 Revision u/s 2633 Section 144B2 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 153(3)(ii)2 Undisclosed Income

HARI NARAYAN BORKATAKY,TINSUKIA vs. ITO WARD - 1, TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

Appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 306/GTY/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati04 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: The Hon'Ble Bench Against The Order Passed Under Section 250 R.W.S. 144 Read With Section 263 Read With Section 144B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Date Of The Order Passing The Appeal Order Is 14/05/2025. Being Aggrieved By The Order, The Appellant Wanted To Appeal Before The Hon'Ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Due To Be Filed On Or Before 31Th July 2025. However, Due To Unavoidable Circumstances, The Appeal Was Filed Only On 9Th October, 2025 With A Delay Of 70 Days.

Section 144BSection 250Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

delay of 70 days which has been requested to be condoned as under: “The appellant has filed an appeal in Form 36 before the Hon'ble Bench against the order passed under Section 250 r.w.s. 144 read with section 263

HARI NARAYAN BORKATAKY,TINSUKIA vs. ITO WARD - 1, TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

HARI NARAYAN BORKATAKY,TINSUKIA vs. ITO WARD - 1, TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

HARI NARAYAN BORKATAKY,TINSUKIA vs. ITO WARD - 1, TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

GURU TEG BAHADUR ACADEMIC SOCIETY,TINSUKIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), EXEMPTION, SHILLONG

JANARDAN MISRA,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI

JANARDAN MISHRA,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI