BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune258Mumbai201Delhi176Jaipur131Ahmedabad126Bangalore123Kolkata110Hyderabad98Chennai90Lucknow43Calcutta37Chandigarh36Cuttack36Surat27Indore26Rajkot25Amritsar25Nagpur23Cochin19Visakhapatnam18Karnataka16Jodhpur12Raipur11Panaji10Agra7Allahabad6Patna6Guwahati4Jabalpur3Ranchi2Varanasi2Dehradun1Telangana1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1SC1

Key Topics

Section 116Section 143(1)5Section 11(2)5Exemption4Addition to Income4Section 2502Section 12A2Section 2632Natural Justice

S.B. BHATTACHARJEE MEMORIAL TRUST FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION ,DIGBOI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 245/GTY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234C

condone any delay in filing of Form 10B as per the aforesaid Circular No. 2 of 2020 dated 03/01/2020. Considering the facts of the case, I am not inclined to agree with the appellant’s submissions. Further, keeping in view the above mentioned legal provisions as per Section 12A(1)(b

ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(4), SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. NORTH EAST SOCIETY OF SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS, MEGHALAYA

ITA 81/GTY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed
2
Condonation of Delay2
ITAT Guwahati
11 Aug 2025
AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

12A of the Act. It was argued by the Ld. DR that the case laws relied upon by the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A) were clearly distinguishable and had no application on the facts of the present case. It was pointed out by the Ld. DR that while there is no specific ground of appeal pertaining to the delay in filing

D P SCHOOL SOCIETY,NAGALAND vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, JURISDICTION WARD TWO(THREE)

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 136/GTY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: The First Appellate Authority. Before The Ld. Addl./Jcit(A), The Assessee Gave The Reasons For Said Delay As Under:

Section 11Section 12ASection 249(3)Section 250

1. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) adopted a rigid and inflexible view of law rather than adopting a liberal interpretation while assessing the case of the Appellant society, which is established for charitable purposes, by not condoning the delay of filing appeal and failed to adopt the settled principle of liberal interpretation applicable to institutions serving

GURU TEG BAHADUR ACADEMIC SOCIETY,TINSUKIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), EXEMPTION, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 91/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati30 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 13(9)Section 143(2)Section 263

section 11 (2) of the Act. 5. For that the Id. CIT was not justified both in law and on facts in arbitrarily branding the order of assessment passed by the Id. AO as erroneous which was passed after due application of mind by the Id. AO. 6. For that the impugned order having been passed in gross violation