BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai338Pune312Ahmedabad225Delhi223Kolkata160Jaipur159Chennai154Bangalore142Hyderabad103Surat55Indore53Lucknow51Chandigarh47Cuttack39Calcutta37Rajkot36Nagpur35Visakhapatnam33Amritsar31Cochin29Karnataka24Raipur15Jodhpur15Patna13Panaji10Allahabad7Guwahati6Agra6Jabalpur5Ranchi3Dehradun3Himachal Pradesh2Varanasi2SC2Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 116Section 143(1)5Section 11(2)5Exemption5Addition to Income5Section 12A4Section 12A(1)(ac)4Section 2503Section 143(2)

S.B. BHATTACHARJEE MEMORIAL TRUST FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION ,DIGBOI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 245/GTY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234C

condone any delay in filing of Form 10B as per the aforesaid Circular No. 2 of 2020 dated 03/01/2020. Considering the facts of the case, I am not inclined to agree with the appellant’s submissions. Further, keeping in view the above mentioned legal provisions as per Section 12A(1

ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(4), SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. NORTH EAST SOCIETY OF SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS, MEGHALAYA

ITA 81/GTY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed
3
Section 1482
Natural Justice2
Charitable Trust2
ITAT Guwahati
11 Aug 2025
AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

condonation of delay prior to processing of return. 3. For that the learned CIT(A) was not justified in holding that the exemption claimed falls under sec. 143(1)(a)(ii)-Incorrect claim. 4. For that the learned CIT(A) was not justified in not allowing Capital Expenditure incurred for the objects of society. 5. The Appellant craves leave

SUMAN AHMED,GAURIPUR vs. ITO, WARD- DHUBRI, DHUBRI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 45/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.45/Gty/2024 Assessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Kushal SoniFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Sekar Das
Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69A

condonation of delay an overall view in the larger interest of justice has to be taken. None should be deprived of Suman Ahmed an adjudication on merits unless the Court of law or the Tribunal/Appellate Authority finds that the litigant has deliberately and intentionally delayed filing of the appeal, that he is careless, negligent and his conduct is lacking

D P SCHOOL SOCIETY,NAGALAND vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, JURISDICTION WARD TWO(THREE)

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 136/GTY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: The First Appellate Authority. Before The Ld. Addl./Jcit(A), The Assessee Gave The Reasons For Said Delay As Under:

Section 11Section 12ASection 249(3)Section 250

1. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) adopted a rigid and inflexible view of law rather than adopting a liberal interpretation while assessing the case of the Appellant society, which is established for charitable purposes, by not condoning the delay of filing appeal and failed to adopt the settled principle of liberal interpretation applicable to institutions serving

SISHU BIKASH KENDRA,MANIK NAGAR, R G BARUAH ROAD vs. ITO W-1(2), GUWAHATI, CHRISTIAN BASTI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 142/GTY/2024[2023-24 ]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jan 2025

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.142/Gty/2024 Assessment Year : 2023-24

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jha
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

section 12A(1)(ac)(iiii) and referring to the CBDT circulars rejected the application filed by the assessee trust holding that the assessee has not filed the application within the extended due date and the CIT has no power to condone the delay

GURU TEG BAHADUR ACADEMIC SOCIETY,TINSUKIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), EXEMPTION, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 91/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati30 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 13(9)Section 143(2)Section 263

section 11 (2) of the Act. 5. For that the Id. CIT was not justified both in law and on facts in arbitrarily branding the order of assessment passed by the Id. AO as erroneous which was passed after due application of mind by the Id. AO. 6. For that the impugned order having been passed in gross violation