BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai83Kolkata74Calcutta60Ahmedabad32Chennai24Delhi17Lucknow17Jaipur15Surat11Chandigarh11Hyderabad10Indore6Varanasi5Bangalore5Guwahati5Pune5Rajkot4Cuttack4Telangana2Patna2Nagpur1Agra1Raipur1Orissa1

Key Topics

Condonation of Delay5Penny Stock4Section 271(1)(c)3

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIMAPUR vs. SHRI AJIT JAIN (HUF), DIMAPUR

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 16/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati27 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

stock cases from the ambit of circular (tax effect). In respect of granting condonation of delay, the Ld. D.R submitted that the Tribunal/High Court/Supreme Court has been liberal in granting condonation of delay provided there is sufficient reasons to justify the same; and since the CBDT became aware of the menace of penny

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIMAPUR vs. SMT. KIRA PATNI, DIMAPUR

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 18/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati27 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

stock cases from the ambit of circular (tax effect). In respect of granting condonation of delay, the Ld. D.R submitted that the Tribunal/High Court/Supreme Court has been liberal in granting condonation of delay provided there is sufficient reasons to justify the same; and since the CBDT became aware of the menace of penny

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, DIMAPUR vs. SMT. SHREYA JAIN, DIMAPUR

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 19/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati27 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

stock cases from the ambit of circular (tax effect). In respect of granting condonation of delay, the Ld. D.R submitted that the Tribunal/High Court/Supreme Court has been liberal in granting condonation of delay provided there is sufficient reasons to justify the same; and since the CBDT became aware of the menace of penny

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIMAPUR vs. SMT. DEEPA LUHADIA, DIMAPUR

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 17/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati27 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

stock cases from the ambit of circular (tax effect). In respect of granting condonation of delay, the Ld. D.R submitted that the Tribunal/High Court/Supreme Court has been liberal in granting condonation of delay provided there is sufficient reasons to justify the same; and since the CBDT became aware of the menace of penny

SANDEEP JALAN,GUWAHATI vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR-1, GUWAHATI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 157/GTY/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Nov 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A), Dated 08.12.2023, Under The Income Tax Act, 1961. 1. Period Of Delay: There Is A Delay Of 494 Days In Filing The Said Appeal

Section 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 69Section 69C

delay is hereby condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 2. The present appeal arises from the order u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”), dated 08.12.2023, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereafter “the Ld. CIT(A)]. 2.1 Brief facts of the case are that