BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 2(15)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,226Delhi1,161Chennai616Bangalore551Karnataka548Ahmedabad366Pune316Jaipur265Kolkata248Hyderabad171Chandigarh128Amritsar96Cochin89Lucknow81Surat81Indore81Rajkot79Visakhapatnam56Cuttack51Allahabad46Nagpur40Raipur37Agra33Telangana31Jodhpur28Patna28SC20Calcutta20Ranchi18Panaji16Kerala11Guwahati10Varanasi10Dehradun8Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana7Jabalpur6Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 14818Section 1112Section 142(1)12Section 143(1)10Section 1548Exemption8Addition to Income7Section 133A6Section 1476

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/GTY/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

15% of such surplus income and be taxed accordingly. 10. The assessee vide letter dated 20.12.2019 pointed out the proviso to section 12A(2) of the I. T. Act 1961 and claimed that provision of section 11 and 12 shall apply in its case and no action u/s 147 can be initiated in view of the said proviso. In this

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Reopening of Assessment6
Survey u/s 133A6
Section 139(1)4
ITA 119/GTY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

15% of such surplus income and be taxed accordingly. 10. The assessee vide letter dated 20.12.2019 pointed out the proviso to section 12A(2) of the I. T. Act 1961 and claimed that provision of section 11 and 12 shall apply in its case and no action u/s 147 can be initiated in view of the said proviso. In this

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 120/GTY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

15% of such surplus income and be taxed accordingly. 10. The assessee vide letter dated 20.12.2019 pointed out the proviso to section 12A(2) of the I. T. Act 1961 and claimed that provision of section 11 and 12 shall apply in its case and no action u/s 147 can be initiated in view of the said proviso. In this

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 121/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

15% of such surplus income and be taxed accordingly. 10. The assessee vide letter dated 20.12.2019 pointed out the proviso to section 12A(2) of the I. T. Act 1961 and claimed that provision of section 11 and 12 shall apply in its case and no action u/s 147 can be initiated in view of the said proviso. In this

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 122/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

15% of such surplus income and be taxed accordingly. 10. The assessee vide letter dated 20.12.2019 pointed out the proviso to section 12A(2) of the I. T. Act 1961 and claimed that provision of section 11 and 12 shall apply in its case and no action u/s 147 can be initiated in view of the said proviso. In this

STAE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 123/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

15% of such surplus income and be taxed accordingly. 10. The assessee vide letter dated 20.12.2019 pointed out the proviso to section 12A(2) of the I. T. Act 1961 and claimed that provision of section 11 and 12 shall apply in its case and no action u/s 147 can be initiated in view of the said proviso. In this

S.B. BHATTACHARJEE MEMORIAL TRUST FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION ,DIGBOI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 245/GTY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234C

2. Bangarh Educational Welfare Trust v. ITO (Exmp) [ITA No. 496/KOL/2021 dt. 02.01.2022] The Hon'ble Co-ordinate Bench of the ITAT has held, to quote:- 12. Now, the second reason for which lower authorities have denied the deduction u/s 11 of the Act is of filing the belated audit report on form 10B of the Act. Now, clause

INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHILLONG vs. THE LITTLE STARS TRUST, ASSAM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 64/GTY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jan 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.64/Gty/2024 Assessment Year : 2022-23

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Kausik Ray
Section 11Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250

2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Charitable trust and is stated to be running Educational Institutions. It filed the return of income for the A.Y. 2022-23 on 07.11.2022 disclosing Nil income after claiming exemption u/s.11 of the Act. The said return was processed by the CPC on 04.04.2023 making adjustment of Rs.4

LUIT ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,JORHAT vs. ITO, W-2(3), EXEM, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 41/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 154Section 250

2 of 7 I.T.A. Nos.: 41 & 42/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-21 & 2021-22 Luit Academic Development Society. of Rs 1,43,26,742/- was made for a reason which was patently wrong and erroneous. For that the appellant urges leave to add to, modify or withdraw any ground of appeal, before or at the time of hearing of the appeal

LUIT ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,JORHAT vs. ITO W-2(3), EXEM, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 42/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jan 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 154Section 250

2 of 7 I.T.A. Nos.: 41 & 42/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-21 & 2021-22 Luit Academic Development Society. of Rs 1,43,26,742/- was made for a reason which was patently wrong and erroneous. For that the appellant urges leave to add to, modify or withdraw any ground of appeal, before or at the time of hearing of the appeal