STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

trust 6 ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam Other Income (as discussed in Para 8)…………………… Rs. 19,53,089.00 Less: Amount of Income allowed as set apart for Application to Charitable or religious purpose to the extent of 15% is.. Rs. 2.92,963.00 Rs.16,60,126.00 Income chargeable

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

trust 6 ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam Other Income (as discussed in Para 8)…………………… Rs. 19,53,089.00 Less: Amount of Income allowed as set apart for Application to Charitable or religious purpose to the extent of 15% is.. Rs. 2.92,963.00 Rs.16,60,126.00 Income chargeable

STAE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

trust 6 ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam Other Income (as discussed in Para 8)…………………… Rs. 19,53,089.00 Less: Amount of Income allowed as set apart for Application to Charitable or religious purpose to the extent of 15% is.. Rs. 2.92,963.00 Rs.16,60,126.00 Income chargeable

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

trust 6 ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam Other Income (as discussed in Para 8)…………………… Rs. 19,53,089.00 Less: Amount of Income allowed as set apart for Application to Charitable or religious purpose to the extent of 15% is.. Rs. 2.92,963.00 Rs.16,60,126.00 Income chargeable

ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(4), SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. NORTH EAST SOCIETY OF SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS, MEGHALAYA

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

2. For that the learned A.O., CPC was not justified in making adjustment u/s 143(1) when CBDT vide Circular No. 2/2020 has issued beneficial circular for condonation of delay prior to processing of return. 3. For that the learned CIT(A) was not justified in holding that the exemption claimed falls under sec. 143(1)(a)(ii)-Incorrect claim

S.B. BHATTACHARJEE MEMORIAL TRUST FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION ,DIGBOI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2. Bangarh Educational Welfare Trust v. ITO (Exmp) [ITA No. 496/KOL/2021 dt. 02.01.2022] The Hon'ble Co-ordinate Bench of the ITAT has held, to quote:- 12. Now, the second reason for which lower authorities have denied the deduction u/s 11 of the Act is of filing the belated audit report on form 10B of the Act. Now, clause

LUIT ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,JORHAT vs. ITO W-2(3), EXEM, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

2 of 7 I.T.A. Nos.: 41 & 42/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-21 & 2021-22 Luit Academic Development Society. of Rs 1,43,26,742/- was made for a reason which was patently wrong and erroneous. For that the appellant urges leave to add to, modify or withdraw any ground of appeal, before or at the time of hearing of the appeal

LUIT ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,JORHAT vs. ITO, W-2(3), EXEM, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

2 of 7 I.T.A. Nos.: 41 & 42/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-21 & 2021-22 Luit Academic Development Society. of Rs 1,43,26,742/- was made for a reason which was patently wrong and erroneous. For that the appellant urges leave to add to, modify or withdraw any ground of appeal, before or at the time of hearing of the appeal

INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. ARUNACHAL PRADESH POLICE WELFARE SOCIETY, PAPUMPARE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH, PAPUMPARE

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Where After A Detailed Finding The Assessee Could Succeed. The Said Finding Deserves To Be Extracted:

143(1) dated 23.08.2022. The facts of the case is that the appellant is a charitable organisation registered under Section 12A of the income-tax Act. 1961. For AY 2021-22 1 filed its return within the extended due date on 31 03:2022 vide ack no 566353530310322 declaring Gross Receipts of Rs 4,50,80,892/- of which