STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

12A(2) reads as under- [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust or institution under section 12AA, then, the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust of any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

12A(2) reads as under- [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust or institution under section 12AA, then, the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust of any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

12A(2) reads as under- [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust or institution under section 12AA, then, the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust of any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer

STAE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

12A(2) reads as under- [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust or institution under section 12AA, then, the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust of any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

12A(2) reads as under- [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust or institution under section 12AA, then, the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust of any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer

ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(4), SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. NORTH EAST SOCIETY OF SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS, MEGHALAYA

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable trust, who had filed a return of income declaring income of Rs. 8,66,800/-, after claiming exemption u/s 11 of the Act amounting to Rs. 16,56,00,042/-. Admittedly, the assessee had filed Form 10B on 10.02.2021, whereas the due date for filing of the said Form was 15.01.2021. Thereafter, the Ld. AO-CPC denied the exemption

LUIT ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,JORHAT vs. ITO, W-2(3), EXEM, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

2 of 7 I.T.A. Nos.: 41 & 42/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-21 & 2021-22 Luit Academic Development Society. of Rs 1,43,26,742/- was made for a reason which was patently wrong and erroneous. For that the appellant urges leave to add to, modify or withdraw any ground of appeal, before or at the time of hearing of the appeal

LUIT ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,JORHAT vs. ITO W-2(3), EXEM, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

2 of 7 I.T.A. Nos.: 41 & 42/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-21 & 2021-22 Luit Academic Development Society. of Rs 1,43,26,742/- was made for a reason which was patently wrong and erroneous. For that the appellant urges leave to add to, modify or withdraw any ground of appeal, before or at the time of hearing of the appeal

INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. ARUNACHAL PRADESH POLICE WELFARE SOCIETY, PAPUMPARE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH, PAPUMPARE

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Where After A Detailed Finding The Assessee Could Succeed. The Said Finding Deserves To Be Extracted:

charitable organisation registered under Section 12A of the income-tax Act. 1961. For AY 2021-22 1 filed its return within the extended due date on 31 03:2022 vide ack no 566353530310322 declaring Gross Receipts of Rs 4,50,80,892/- of which 3.37,97,943/- was towards voluntary contribution forming part of corpus (being amount collected as contribution

D P SCHOOL SOCIETY,NAGALAND vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, JURISDICTION WARD TWO(THREE)

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: The First Appellate Authority. Before The Ld. Addl./Jcit(A), The Assessee Gave The Reasons For Said Delay As Under:

charitable organizations whose objective is to serve the public good and not to earn profits. Technical or procedural lapses should not be allowed to override the cause of substantial justice, as has been repeatedly emphasized by various judicial pronouncements. 2. That the demand of 2,79,09,413/- raised against the Appellant, a trust duly registered under Section 12A

SISHU BIKASH KENDRA,MANIK NAGAR, R G BARUAH ROAD vs. ITO W-1(2), GUWAHATI, CHRISTIAN BASTI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.142/Gty/2024 Assessment Year : 2023-24

2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is stated to be a Charitable Trust formed in the year 1995. The Sishu Bikash Kendra assessee was granted provisional registration u/s.12A on 28.02.2023. Thereafter, the assessee filed application in Form No.10AB u/s.12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act for grant of regular registration on 26.10.2023. In order

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TEACHER EDUCATION,KHETRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), GUWAHATI , GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

2. Shri R C Bharali, Secretary of above institution contended that assessee institution is a unit under “Bharali Education Foundation" which is a Registered trust and its income is exempted however, trust deed produced by Shri Bharali do not exhibit the name, status as well as objectives of assessee institution. 3. It has been observed in course of proceedings neither