BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 11(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,484Delhi990Chennai849Bangalore626Karnataka508Ahmedabad407Jaipur295Kolkata235Pune222Hyderabad167Cochin118Chandigarh105Surat103Indore100Lucknow83Rajkot74Visakhapatnam71Cuttack67Allahabad52Nagpur46Raipur39Amritsar37Jodhpur30Calcutta25Agra25Telangana22Patna21SC19Ranchi15Panaji15Varanasi14Kerala13Jabalpur11Guwahati7Punjab & Haryana5Dehradun5Rajasthan4Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 14818Section 142(1)12Exemption7Addition to Income7Section 133A6Section 1476Reopening of Assessment6Survey u/s 133A6Section 11

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 119/GTY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

D E R Per Bench:- The present group of six appeals is directed at the instance of assessee against separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 11.03.2020 passed on the respective ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam appeals of the appellant in Assessment Years

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

2
ITA 120/GTY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

D E R Per Bench:- The present group of six appeals is directed at the instance of assessee against separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 11.03.2020 passed on the respective ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam appeals of the appellant in Assessment Years

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 121/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

D E R Per Bench:- The present group of six appeals is directed at the instance of assessee against separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 11.03.2020 passed on the respective ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam appeals of the appellant in Assessment Years

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 122/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

D E R Per Bench:- The present group of six appeals is directed at the instance of assessee against separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 11.03.2020 passed on the respective ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam appeals of the appellant in Assessment Years

STAE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 123/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

D E R Per Bench:- The present group of six appeals is directed at the instance of assessee against separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 11.03.2020 passed on the respective ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam appeals of the appellant in Assessment Years

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/GTY/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

D E R Per Bench:- The present group of six appeals is directed at the instance of assessee against separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 11.03.2020 passed on the respective ITA Nos. 119-124/GAU/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-2013 to 2017-2018 State Health Society Assam appeals of the appellant in Assessment Years

D P SCHOOL SOCIETY,NAGALAND vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, JURISDICTION WARD TWO(THREE)

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 136/GTY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: The First Appellate Authority. Before The Ld. Addl./Jcit(A), The Assessee Gave The Reasons For Said Delay As Under:

Section 11Section 12ASection 249(3)Section 250

charitable purposes, strictly in accordance with the provisions of Sections 11 of the Act. There is neither any finding nor any allegation by the Department regarding usage of funds. 3. That the appellant craves leave to add, amend, or withdraw any of the above grounds at the time of hearing.” 2. Before us, the Ld. AR vehemently argued that