ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(4), SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. NORTH EAST SOCIETY OF SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS, MEGHALAYA

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable trust, who had filed a return of income declaring income of Rs. 8,66,800/-, after claiming exemption u/s 11 of the Act amounting to Rs. 16,56,00,042/-. Admittedly, the assessee had filed Form 10B on 10.02.2021, whereas the due date for filing of the said Form was 15.01.2021. Thereafter, the Ld. AO-CPC denied the exemption

D P SCHOOL SOCIETY,NAGALAND vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, JURISDICTION WARD TWO(THREE)

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: The First Appellate Authority. Before The Ld. Addl./Jcit(A), The Assessee Gave The Reasons For Said Delay As Under:

trust duly registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is wholly unjustified. The Appellant has been consistently claiming exemption under Section 11 for the past assessment years and continues to claim exemption under Section 11 even in the current assessment year, and the same is being accepted by the Department, reflecting the consistency of its charitable

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust for any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust for any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust for any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust for any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year

STAE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust for any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust for any assessment year preceding aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the assessing officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year

INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. ARUNACHAL PRADESH POLICE WELFARE SOCIETY, PAPUMPARE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH, PAPUMPARE

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Where After A Detailed Finding The Assessee Could Succeed. The Said Finding Deserves To Be Extracted:

charitable organisation registered under Section 12A of the income-tax Act. 1961. For AY 2021-22 1 filed its return within the extended due date on 31 03:2022 vide ack no 566353530310322 declaring Gross Receipts of Rs 4,50,80,892/- of which 3.37,97,943/- was towards voluntary contribution forming part of corpus (being amount collected as contribution

PURVANCHAL CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,GUWAHATI, ASSAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3) (EXEMP), WARD-2(3) (EXEMP), GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

charitable activities, details of donations, declarations, etc. 7. Despite the appellant's full compliance and submission of all details as requisitioned vide notice dtd.30/12/2022, the Ld. CIT(E), Kolkata, vide order dtd.27/01/2023, rejected the appellant's application filed in Form 10AB for registration under clause (iii) of the first proviso to Section

LUIT ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,JORHAT vs. ITO, W-2(3), EXEM, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

charitable purposes and, therefore, the entire receipts of Rs. 1,84,40,933/- were claimed as exempt u/s 11 of the Act. An intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act was issued raising a demand of Rs. 79,85,960/-. The order was erroneous in the opinion of the assessee as the revenue expenditure at page 20, the Annexure-Schedule

LUIT ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,JORHAT vs. ITO W-2(3), EXEM, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

charitable purposes and, therefore, the entire receipts of Rs. 1,84,40,933/- were claimed as exempt u/s 11 of the Act. An intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act was issued raising a demand of Rs. 79,85,960/-. The order was erroneous in the opinion of the assessee as the revenue expenditure at page 20, the Annexure-Schedule

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TEACHER EDUCATION,KHETRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), GUWAHATI , GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act for the impugned A.Y. are as under: “Any university or other educational institution existing solely for educational purposes and not for purposes of profit if the aggregate annual receipts of such university or educational institution do not exceed the amount of annual receipts as may be prescribed.” 4.4. The assessee submitted that