BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka269Chennai187Mumbai186Delhi177Bangalore115Hyderabad80Ahmedabad77Pune64Jaipur55Chandigarh40Allahabad33Cochin32Kolkata29Lucknow24Indore16Visakhapatnam15Amritsar11Nagpur10Rajkot10Jodhpur9Cuttack8Raipur7Guwahati7Surat6SC6Agra4Patna4Telangana4Varanasi4Dehradun1Kerala1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 14818Section 142(1)12Exemption7Addition to Income7Section 133A6Section 1476Reopening of Assessment6Survey u/s 133A6Section 10

STAE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 123/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

penalty recovered for late execution of work, etc. 8.4. Therefore, the 'other income' of Rs.19,53,089/- is considered as gross receipt and taxable as the same is not grant-in-aid as evident from the letter so submitted and also on its nature of receipt. 9. The assessee claimed that since the entire surplus is not their income

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

3
Section 1442
ITA 121/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

penalty recovered for late execution of work, etc. 8.4. Therefore, the 'other income' of Rs.19,53,089/- is considered as gross receipt and taxable as the same is not grant-in-aid as evident from the letter so submitted and also on its nature of receipt. 9. The assessee claimed that since the entire surplus is not their income

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 122/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

penalty recovered for late execution of work, etc. 8.4. Therefore, the 'other income' of Rs.19,53,089/- is considered as gross receipt and taxable as the same is not grant-in-aid as evident from the letter so submitted and also on its nature of receipt. 9. The assessee claimed that since the entire surplus is not their income

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 120/GTY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

penalty recovered for late execution of work, etc. 8.4. Therefore, the 'other income' of Rs.19,53,089/- is considered as gross receipt and taxable as the same is not grant-in-aid as evident from the letter so submitted and also on its nature of receipt. 9. The assessee claimed that since the entire surplus is not their income

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/GTY/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

penalty recovered for late execution of work, etc. 8.4. Therefore, the 'other income' of Rs.19,53,089/- is considered as gross receipt and taxable as the same is not grant-in-aid as evident from the letter so submitted and also on its nature of receipt. 9. The assessee claimed that since the entire surplus is not their income

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 119/GTY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

penalty recovered for late execution of work, etc. 8.4. Therefore, the 'other income' of Rs.19,53,089/- is considered as gross receipt and taxable as the same is not grant-in-aid as evident from the letter so submitted and also on its nature of receipt. 9. The assessee claimed that since the entire surplus is not their income

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TEACHER EDUCATION,KHETRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), GUWAHATI , GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 16/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 144Section 250Section 272B

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- is liable to be imposed under Section 272B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for having more than one PAN. Hence, the contention of the appellant that the appellant is not a separate taxable entity is not tenable in law. Moreover, the appellant has failed during the assessment proceedings as well as during the appellate